| User | Post |
|
7:59 am December 8, 2008
| Andy
| | Liverpool | |
| Investigator | posts 101 |
|
|
|
8:24 am December 8, 2008
| Wes
| | Spaulding Inn, Room 38 | |
| Investigator | posts 142 |
|
|
I think "rods" have been completely deunked as insects and birds — the best debunking was on, I believe, an episode of "Monster Quest" – or was it an episode of "Is it Real?" — in any event it has to do with the speed of the cameras being inadequate to capture the speed of the creatures sufficiently, producing the rod-like images. The crew was able to reproduce classic "rods" by shaking a bush and getting some insects to zip by their cameras …
|
"The truth shall bear all light."
|
|
|
10:38 am December 8, 2008
| Logisti
| | |
| Admin
| posts 177 |
|
|
Agree with Wes. It was a Monsterquest ep. They basically overturned the old adage that the camera never lies. In fact, because a video is essentially a series of still photographs and however long the shutter is open for on a given still photo can result in a blurry photo if the object was moving too fast. In this case, they did a side-by-side with a slow motion camera (1000 frames per second, or something) and you could clearly see the insect in that camera, while the camera next to it just as clearly showed a "rod" because it wasn't fast enough to capture the insect accurately.
|
|
|
11:28 pm December 8, 2008
| Learjet
| | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
Yep, as a photographer I can tell you that a camera can lie more than you would think. All the "rod" footage I've seen are most definitely insects.
Most conspiracy theories that revolve around photos or video are from people that don't understand a camera's limitations or the artifacts they generate.
|
|