| User | Post |
|
12:14 am August 20, 2009
| Revenant
| | Hopelessly Locked In A "Fear Cage" | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1393 |
|
|
We have all seen countless shows on the Pyramids. Usually, when there is something new, it's a tomb. This time, it's a bit different. A British explorer claims that there is "an enormous system of caves, chambers and tunnels lies hidden beneath the Pyramids of Giza." Here's the link:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32417238/ns/technology_and_science-science/
Ok…a few things on this:
1) There seems to be some question as to what was actually found. The article constantly uses the word "claims." It's sort of odd to me. Either there is a cave system under the pyramids or there isn't. Pick one. If there isn't substantial evidence to support the claim, then why write the article?
2) I've seen so many shows on Egypt and tombs and the pyramids…they all kind of blend together. But I swear I saw one using different types of GPR (ground penetrating radar) and satellite imagery looking for tunnels. The premise was that there was a hidden chamber somewhere and that they were trying to find it. It was hoped that scrolls from the Library of Alexandria were there. Needless to say, they never found anything like that. But I remember seeing the graphics of "suggested" tunnels and such underneath the pyramids. A cave system under the pyramids doesn't seem so far fetched, although…if my memory about that show was accurate, I wonder why they didn't discover it…if it does indeed exist.
3) Lastly, this caught my eye:
"Zahi Hawass, chief of Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities, has dismissed the discovery. 'There are no new discoveries to be made at Giza. We know everything about the plateau,' he stated."
Now, that's a very odd position to take. Zahi Hawass is an interesting character. He's on EVERY show pertaining to Egypt and his pyramids. His ego is so big (how big is it?)…that he's had to sign treaties with neighboring countries because his ego actually extends past the boundaries of Egypt itself. But to actually say what he did…um, not too scientific there. You know, something tells me that if the explorer was from…oh, I don't know, say Egypt, then this discovery would probably be earth-shattering and spectacular. Since the explorer is British…yeah…"We know everything about the plateau…so, nothing to see here. Buy your souvineirs and move along. Keep behind the rope at all times…"
|
"Skepticism is not a position, it's a process." -Dr Michael Shermer
|
|
|
4:08 am August 20, 2009
| blinddog
| | Special Agent Zombie Elimination Agency | |
| Moderator
| posts 857 |
|
|
Hmmm, big ego, yeah that fits.
If 'I' don't know it then it can not be possible attitude.
Hawass, isn't that Egyptian for Hawes?
Maybe we have stumbled upon a lost branch of Jason's family tree.
Rev, you are right about the shows concerning the Giza Pyramids, I don't even bother anymore.
It's just a matter of time before someone interprets a hieroglyphic as a pharaoh sitting in front of a 52" plasma tv with a remote as a scepter.
Powered, of course, by a long lost energy source given to them by ET's.
|
Double tap to the head. Don't become Undead.
|
|
|
8:02 am August 20, 2009
| alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
With all due respect, this Andrew Collins is not actually an "explorer" in the true sense of an explorer. He is a writer, a science fiction author and is a self proclaimed historian/explorer with no credible credentials.
Here is a snipet describing Mr. Collins and his "exploration" of crop circles in his book "The New Circlemakers": "Andrew argues that psychic communications with alleged extraterrestrial sources by modern-day light workers might well be involved in this extraordinary process, which he calls deep space consciousness. Andrew demonstrates also how the circles phenomenon goes back at least 400 years, and is present even in native American folklore."
Mr. Collins has also written his theories on his search for Atlantis in a book "Gateway to Atlantis" which have never been proven along with many others including "The Seventh Sword: Psychic Quest for King Arthur's Sword" and "Tutankhamun: The Exodus Conspiracy – The Truth Behind Archeology's Greatest Mystery" to name a few.
From what I can determine, he, like many others, takes what others write and then reassembles the words to make "his" revalation. That should sound familiar to many on this board, huh? 
I totally agree with the assessment of Dr. Hawass and understand his comments regarding this alleged "explorer". I don't think it would matter if this person was Egyptian or not. Even though in a past post I have stated Dr. Hawass is a character who has a huge ego, he does have immense knowledge, impeccable qualifications, and is considered and respected by all to be "the" world renowned expert whereas this Collins has absolutely no credibility other than being able to get science fiction books of his theories published (uh oh – could GHI recruit him?). In Egypt, no grain of sand goes unturned without Zahi Hawass' knowledge and no exploration does either. If there was even a remote chance of anything being uncovered, you can be sure you would see a picture of Dr. Hawass checking it out.
BD50 – Yes, it could be possible he is a part of the lost branch of the Hawes family tree (ego wise) but obviously Jason wouldn't have him on his "team" because Hawass is smarter than him although that wouldn't stop him from introducing Dr. Hawass as his "real good friend and relative".
|
|
|
11:59 am August 21, 2009
| Revenant
| | Hopelessly Locked In A "Fear Cage" | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1393 |
|
|
Alicat- Excellent job in finding out who this Andrew Collins is. I've taken a look at some of his work. He definitely covers the gambit…Atlantis, cosmic rays, angels, crop circles, etc. It makes the original article all the more curious. Why would a legitimate news service cover it?
I mean he isn't talking about the usual nonsense that he normally does. He's "claiming" a cave system in a very specific area. It should be pretty easy to figure out if the claim is true or not. Why cover the story before actual verification is absurd to me, especially with his track record.
You said "I totally agree with the assessment of Dr. Hawass and understand his comments regarding this alleged "explorer". I don't think it would matter if this person was Egyptian or not."
I will respectfully disagree with both statements.
To say "There are no new discoveries to be made at Giza. We know everything about the plateau." is egotistical, narrow-minded, and unscientific. Although I can see the frustration in dealing with people like Collins or Eric von Daniken, I expect a more even, thoughtful, and scientific rebuttal from such an educated and media-savvy man. In retrospect, I doubt that was the sound-bite that he would have gone with if he had thought about it for a moment.
In my third point in my first post, I glossed over the tension between Dr Hawass and the British with a joke. I guess I should have mentioned why. Here's a paragraph about it from wiki on the Rosetta Stone:
"In July 2003, Egypt requested the return of the Rosetta Stone. Dr. Zahi Hawass, secretary general of the Supreme Council of Antiquities in Cairo, told the press: "If the British want to be remembered, if they want to restore their reputation, they should volunteer to return the Rosetta Stone because it is the icon of our Egyptian identity." In 2005, Hawass was negotiating for a three-month loan, with the eventual goal of a permanent return. In November 2005, the British Museum sent him a replica of the stone."
I think whoever wrote that was being kind in saying "requested." They were demanding it at the time. Can you imagine the look on Dr Hawass's face when he heard that they were sending him a replica? With his ego? Now combine that with another Brit, Howard Carter, who discovered the greatest discovery in Egypt, King Tut, and there's going to be a little resentment with any British "explorer (real or not)" discovering anything in Egypt. Even the French can't catch a break with him. Here's an article that shows both the good and the bad of Dr Hawass at The New York Times.
|
"Skepticism is not a position, it's a process." -Dr Michael Shermer
|
|
|
12:07 pm August 21, 2009
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
I doubt that was the sound-bite that he would have gone with if he had thought about it for a moment.
You used an interesting word. Sound-bite. Was this all that Hawass said? Do we have the full text of the response? Is it possible that this was a small portion extracted from a larger response and designed to cast him in this light? (I'm well aware of his ego, though)
This was a case where there was apparently precedence of these caves from an earlier explorer and should not be dismissed out of hand…but again, do we have the full story?
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
1:02 pm August 21, 2009
| Revenant
| | Hopelessly Locked In A "Fear Cage" | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1393 |
|
|
Nosfer said:
I doubt that was the sound-bite that he would have gone with if he had thought about it for a moment.
You used an interesting word. Sound-bite. Was this all that Hawass said? Do we have the full text of the response? Is it possible that this was a small portion extracted from a larger response and designed to cast him in this light? (I'm well aware of his ego, though)
This was a case where there was apparently precedence of these caves from an earlier explorer and should not be dismissed out of hand…but again, do we have the full story?
Excellent point and that's why I used the term "sound-bite" while also mentioning that he is definitely media-savvy. He should know better. But as for his full response, if there was more, no clue. I would hope so, but every article that I've seen thus far on this topic is pretty much the same. I would like to see his full response if indeed there was more.
Do we have the full story? I would say highly doubtful. Just overall, the article seemed very weird to me and grossly incomplete. Someone, other than Collins, is now going to have to spend both time and money on this to verify it one way or another. I would be amazed if it actually did exist. I've got to think that the area in question has been searched quite extensively.
|
"Skepticism is not a position, it's a process." -Dr Michael Shermer
|
|
|
1:14 pm August 21, 2009
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
I recall the idea of the tunnel under the Sphinx in the past, too…was that the GPR story you were referring to?
My additional reasons for reservation stem from language. What we probably have is a single Hawass sentence excerpted from a longer response that was originally given IN ARABIC. Translations are notorious for not giving the real essence of a statement, especially with portions taken from context.
Definitely incomplete, and because of the way it was done, we are left with even less because as you rightly say, verification needs to be done. And that may not be easy given the climate.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
1:58 pm August 21, 2009
| Revenant
| | Hopelessly Locked In A "Fear Cage" | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1393 |
|
|
Nosfer said:
I recall the idea of the tunnel under the Sphinx in the past, too…was that the GPR story you were referring to?
I think so…but like I said…they all kind of blend together after a while… 
As for Dr Hawass giving his response in Arabic…I have no clue. I would assume that he gave his response in English since he would probably be responding to English speaking reporters about it. But again, I have no way to verify it. If this story does "grow legs" perhaps he will be given a chance to clarify his position or at least be fully quoted (if there was more to the quote).
|
"Skepticism is not a position, it's a process." -Dr Michael Shermer
|
|
|
6:49 pm August 22, 2009
| alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
Thanks Revenant. I did understand you were joking. As far as why they would cover the story, why not? It is controversial and was picked up on the wires. This Collins character, his friends, "colleagues" and his publisher probably screamed to the hills so I think it's possible they just didn't want to be the last one commenting if something did turn up. No one wants the boss to come in and ask why someone didn't cover what might be the biggest story since Harold Carter found King Tut's tomb. (Plus I secretly think there are a lot of people who want to put a pin in Dr. Hawass' ego.)
I think you and Nosfer are exactly right. We'll never know what he actually said. Yes, he is media savvy and should know better but he also has a quick temper and is quite defensive. On the other hand, he can be quite charming which you don't hear much about. Add all that to an incredible ego and you've got quite a mix.
As far a the Rosetta Stone, yes, that was a slap in the face but I do understand his dream (although not his methods) to have it returned to Egypt. It's an amazing piece of history and I highly recommend a visit to the British Museum when in London to see it and all the other incredible historical collections. It's an experience that will get you hooked and it's free which is a rarity these days. 
|
|
|
1:11 pm August 23, 2009
| Revenant
| | Hopelessly Locked In A "Fear Cage" | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1393 |
|
|
alicat said:
As far a the Rosetta Stone, yes, that was a slap in the face but I do understand his dream (although not his methods) to have it returned to Egypt. It's an amazing piece of history and I highly recommend a visit to the British Museum when in London to see it and all the other incredible historical collections. It's an experience that will get you hooked and it's free which is a rarity these days. 
I'm torn with the Rosetta Stone. On the one hand, it did come from Egypt. They do have a rightful claim. However, it was discovered by the French and deciphered, primarily, by both the French and the English. I'm unaware if there were laws in place by Egypt in 1799 concerning antiquities and taking them out of the country. And if there were laws like that at the time, maybe it wouldn't really matter because Napoleon was in the process of taking Egypt so it would fall under the "spoils of war" category. And then to compound matters, the English took it from the French soldiers.
When it comes to war and the spoils of war, I side with the winner. If someone comes into your country during wartime and takes something and you do nothing about it, don't come crying to me because you want it back. It's really up to the country who has possession of it. Is that fair? *shrugs* Not sure, but that's the way it is.
If it were up to me…I'd try to work out a "revolving" trade. The British Museum, in a show of faith, gives full ownership of the Stone to Egypt. In return, the main Egyptian museum and the British Museum begin loaning out exhibits to each other for a specified amount of time, including the Stone (so both countries may marvel at it). In this way, both museums win by showcasing new and cool exhibits all the time and it also helps a bit with foreign relations…always a good thing. Then again, I'm not in charge…yet…
|
"Skepticism is not a position, it's a process." -Dr Michael Shermer
|
|
|
1:22 pm August 23, 2009
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
So maybe the Stone should actually have to be returned to the Turks or did the Mamluqs retain enough autonomous control in "Egypt" after the start of the 1500s that it should still belong to them? I mean, how far back do you go to establish ownership? Or, since it was created under the Ptolemies, is it in fact Greek?
Then you have claims such as those that all coins originating in Italy should be returned….
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
7:29 am August 24, 2009
| alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
Too complicated for me. Somebody just make a decision! I am glad though that I got a chance to see it along with many other treasures. I love the idea of travelling exhibitions as well. I always kicked myself when I never went to see the Tutankhamun exhibit when it came to the U.S. in the 70's. However, I was lucky enough to see the current tour which was an absolutely incredible experience.
|
|
|
10:58 am August 24, 2009
| Revenant
| | Hopelessly Locked In A "Fear Cage" | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1393 |
|
|
alicat said:
I always kicked myself when I never went to see the Tutankhamun exhibit when it came to the U.S. in the 70's. However, I was lucky enough to see the current tour which was an absolutely incredible experience.
I saw the Tut exhibit in 70's as a kid in Chicago. And as a kid, I don't think I fully appreciated it at the time. I remember when I got home and was asked about it, I raved about seeing into a back room. I was with the tour and a guy opened a door to a back room to step in. Inside that room…I'm not sure if they were Chicago police, FBI, or what, but they were armed to the teeth in full battle gear. It looked like a small army preparing for an invasion. As a young boy…nothing really cooler than that! Even to this day, it still makes me laugh. Unless someone brought in a few tanks…NOTHING was happening to that Tut exhibit while in Chicago. And I wouldn't be surprised if they had anti-tank weapons with them as well…. 
|
"Skepticism is not a position, it's a process." -Dr Michael Shermer
|
|
|
11:13 am August 24, 2009
| alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
I'm so jealous and I do understand your excitement at seeing such a sight especially behind a closed door. It must have added that much more to the experience.
|
|
|
11:17 am August 24, 2009
| Revenant
| | Hopelessly Locked In A "Fear Cage" | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1393 |
|
|
Nosfer said:
So maybe the Stone should actually have to be returned to the Turks or did the Mamluqs retain enough autonomous control in "Egypt" after the start of the 1500s that it should still belong to them? I mean, how far back do you go to establish ownership? Or, since it was created under the Ptolemies, is it in fact Greek?
Then you have claims such as those that all coins originating in Italy should be returned….
An excellent point. That's why I side with the "winners" like I said in that post that you were responding to. Returning stolen items and/or items taken during war is such a slippery slope. That's why I kind of like the "revolving" trade idea between countries. It kind of starts getting away from "your" history or "my" history and gets more into "our" history, as in mankind.
And this idea isn't mine in the least. Museums have been doing it for quite some time. I'd just like to see them ramp it up a bit. I mean the fact that the Rosetta Stone hasn't been to Egypt in 200 years is kind of a shame. And I wouldn't mind seeing it make a stop in Greece either. I guess I'm just not a big fan of a museum holding on to particular pieces forever. The Rosetta Stone is an important piece in the world's history…so…share it with the world. This "Either come to my house and see it or you don't get to see it at all" mentality is out-dated.
|
"Skepticism is not a position, it's a process." -Dr Michael Shermer
|
|
|
3:01 pm August 30, 2009
| alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
Revenant, Nosfer and BD,
I took a few hours (and a few miles) out of my day today to do some shopping for each of you. I know I'm rather late in doing this but it was tough to decide exactly where to go for that perfect gift. So, here you go. Your choice of one of the following:
http://www.britishmuseumshoponline.org/invt/cmcr90850#
http://www.britishmuseumshoponline.org/invt/cmct79970#
http://www.britishmuseumshoponline.org/invt/cmc31078#
http://www.britishmuseumshoponline.org/invt/cmc31252
http://www.britishmuseumshoponline.org/invt/cmc30248
   
|
|
|
3:13 pm August 30, 2009
| Sheetie Attitude
| | |
| Investigator | posts 50 |
|
|
Wow! I am so getting that Egyptian timeline book. Anyone who can cram that much history into a 12 page foldout and a 32 page book is my hero. I can't even explain what I did last weekend in less than 37 pages. 
|
|
|
3:52 pm August 30, 2009
| Revenant
| | Hopelessly Locked In A "Fear Cage" | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1393 |
|
|
alicat said:
Revenant, Nosfer and BD,
I took a few hours (and a few miles) out of my day today to do some shopping for each of you. I know I'm rather late in doing this but it was tough to decide exactly where to go for that perfect gift. So, here you go. Your choice of one of the following:
Hmmm…tough choices. I'll go with option #1; the Rosetta Stone replica for two reasons. The first, I already have some fossils in black stone, so it will match. The second, I'll have one more thing in common with Dr Hawass other than a giant ego, we'll both have a replica of the Rosetta Stone… 
And since you were so kind to get us gifts…you can have this.
|
"Skepticism is not a position, it's a process." -Dr Michael Shermer
|
|
|
4:05 pm August 30, 2009
| alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|