| User | Post |
|
12:19 pm
March 20, 2011
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
Post edited 12:23 pm – March 20, 2011 by Nosfer
Unless this was an iron-based life form… 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci…..osits.html
The takeaway from this is:
"It was a good lesson in trusting your data over what you’d been told you should find." Good words to live by, right GH, GHI, FoF, GA, PS, GL, and TK?
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
1:12 pm
March 20, 2011
|
Oubliette
| | Igloo in NJ | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 574 |
|
|
Well, that's disappointing! Guess researchers will have to keep on looking, but there will be these fumbles along the way. At least true scientists are not afraid to come out and admit when they are wrong, unlike "experts" in certain other fields 
|
If 50 million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing.
Anatole France
|
|
|
1:31 pm
March 20, 2011
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
Very true, and just goes to show that there is a lot that we think might be known that still can be disproved and vice versa.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
6:29 pm
March 20, 2011
|
Axel Olrik
| | |
| Investigator | posts 184 |
|
|
An iron-based life form? How extraordinary!
|
|
Login 
Register 
The Forum [is where Ancient Roman skeptics hang out.]
Reply to Post
Quote and Reply 
Print this Post 
Topic RSS 
