The Forum [is where Ancient Roman skeptics hang out.] : The Grant List

Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering

UserPost

12:02 pm
December 20, 2008


Oubliette

Lead Investigator

Land of the Jersey Devil

posts 527

CrowTRobot said:


Oubliette said:

…  And how Tango, the new guy, proved his worth by catching it, too!  Personally I do wonder if Tango had anything to do with it but it certainly got him recognition straight off the bat.


I don't think Tango was involved.  Actually, I'm on the list of people who think he wasn't in on it, and thus spoiled the evidence set up by the 'one person who did it'.

It would be interesting to go back and see how Tango was treated after this. I'm not sure of the timeline; but at the present, he's nothing more than Steve's goof.


"….he's nothing more than Steve's goof" - Yes, and it's a shame.  I liked him when he first came on; after all he's from New Jersey Wink.  So I kinda rooted for him to do good.  And he was more serious to begin with and seemed to really want to do a thorough job.  Now I call Steve & Tango "Laurel & Hardy".  Pilgrim must think the audience is pretty dim not to realize that those two have been chosen to add a comedic element to the show.  Can it be any more obvious what is going on here?

It has also crossed my mind that Tango's sharp eyes found that faked evidence on the QM and, as you put it, he was wasn't in the know and sort of threw cold water on that party.  Of course, one could argue about why they didn't edit it out, but it was a major (although faked) event and then GH could show just how great and wonderful they are by having shown that they "can't be fooled".

As always, a bunch of scenarios, but unless someone wants to spill the beans, it's likely we will never know.  GH itself is becoming more and more structured and seems to follow a set formula.  The Dynamic Duo (Jay and Grant), the Funny Guys (Steve and Tango), the Giggly Girls (Kris & Amy) and making occasional appearances with bit parts and hardly ever finding any evidence (Joe and Krysten).  Only the new season will show if there will be any departures from this cast.

3:50 pm
December 20, 2008


Stephen

Moderator

San Jose, CA

posts 509

I doubt if we'll ever know exactly who faked the Queen Mary sheets. I don't see it as a Grant List candidate, because as far as I recall Grant was in no better (or, probably, worse) position to do this than many other people on the scene that day. It does match many of the other Grant List items in terms of MO, but we can't blame it on Grant for that reason, or the list turns from interesting circumstantial evidence to a corkscrew of circular logic (blaming Grant for things because Grant seems so suspicious).

Are TAPS members more likely than local staff to have done it? Maybe, maybe not– but that's a separate topic.


9:58 pm
December 24, 2008


Dedicated_Dad

Investigator

posts 64

Personally I've always thought the skinny little "ghost guide"/wannabe "medium" was behind that one.

She was as convincing as she could be (trying, anyway) when she tried to tell them the HW boiler for the whole ship was being haunted as they spoke…

I wonder how many hundreds of people believed her when she told them that same lame story… Undecided

DD

9:45 am
December 25, 2008


Haephiteus

Investigator

Taylor, MI

posts 54

Dedicated_Dad said:

Personally I've always thought the skinny little "ghost guide"/wannabe "medium" was behind that one.

She was as convincing as she could be (trying, anyway) when she tried to tell them the HW boiler for the whole ship was being haunted as they spoke…

I wonder how many hundreds of people believed her when she told them that same lame story… Undecided

DD

I thought the same thing, she was too……..sure of herself I think


12:51 pm
December 26, 2008


Oubliette

Lead Investigator

Land of the Jersey Devil

posts 527

Haephiteus said:

Dedicated_Dad said:

Personally I've always thought the skinny little "ghost guide"/wannabe "medium" was behind that one.

She was as convincing as she could be (trying, anyway) when she tried to tell them the HW boiler for the whole ship was being haunted as they spoke…

I wonder how many hundreds of people believed her when she told them that same lame story… Undecided

DD

I thought the same thing, she was too……..sure of herself I think



And telling that BS to two plumbers–not that was really an "open mouth, insert foot" moment!

10:12 pm
December 26, 2008


NewbieGhost13

Investigator in Training

posts 19

Ah, good. I'm not the only one who thinks the Queen Mary sheets were done by that ghost tour guide women.  After all, as Grant stated about the little hallway behind the room..'A very small person could fit through there.' Certainly describes not only Grant but really that tour guide women. Here's why I think she did the Queen Mary Sheet Pull:

1. She is an employee for the Queen Mary and would know all the ins, outs, and general layout of the ship. She would also know where TAPS investigators were at the time. (Yes these statements are also true of all the Queen Mary workers but…)
2.    2. Her exact function on the ship appears to be the 'Ghost Tour Guide.' as evidenced by TAPS footage scrolling her name and title on the bottom of the screen during her interview during the episode. It would suck pretty badly for her if TAPS didn't find any compelling evidence of a haunting considering her job title and role. I wonder what that would mean for her position as Ship's 'Ghost Tour' guides….hmm…
3.    3. She is certainly small enough to fit through that backroom door leading to a small crawl space out into the hallway. (You can't tell me that all or even most of the Queen Mary workers could fit through there.) (I don't think TAPS knew about the door until after they noticed the deceit)
4.    4. She totally BS'd about the non-working working water-heater thing. Either she knew it worked and lied or she is incredibly stupid to not check it out for herself. (Personally, if heard strange sounds coming from a machine I was told was broken the first thing I'd do would be to walk over and check that thing out to see if it really was broken.)She admitted being 'sensitive' in the room with the totally normal and working machine believing some presence was there or something 'going on' and it made her on edge. (Yeah, I bet. Major lies going on if you ask me…)
5.    5. She was the one who showed them the room with the 'Anti-Maid Ghost who Loves Unmade Beds'. Since she showed them the room and was with them at the time Grant made the bed and set up the camera, she knew exactly where in the room the camera was so as not to be seen on it. (In fair disclosure TAPS knew too.)
6.    6. During the initial work-through she just seemed, well, to put nicely, 'spacey'. Like she really wasn't with Grant, J, and Steve. She seemed like she was in her own little world. (Now, that's not really proof of anything other than she doesn't give good interviews and her nervous behavior could just be because she's shy in front of TV cameras but that's not a particularly good quality to have in a 'tour guide'.)

9:55 am
December 27, 2008


Dr. Peter Venkman

Guest

The guilty party would have to know that the camera had it's timestamping turned off.

There would have to be no sound, no light and no vibration of the camera during entry or exit.

The guide would need an accomplice to start and stop the camera while she is behind the bed pulling the sheets.

If caught in the act, there would be no talking her way out of it.


My candidate ? …. Tech Manager Steve

He makes sure the camera is not set to have timestamps.

He needs to visit the site multiple times to check the tapes.

HE handles reviewing the tapes, yet dosen't notice the blanket glitch Tango finds, nor does he think to listen to the sound untill the con is blown.

When he does listen to it, he says "you can almost hear after that like a door open and close", yet noone thinks to put the camera back and open and close both doors and the passageway to try to duplicate the sound ?   This from people who can drag whole conversations from the faintest of EVP's?

Who was his accomplice to pause and start the camera ?  The "Tech Manager" might be the only one who knew of, and had access to, the camera remote control.


5:56 pm
December 27, 2008


Anthon

Investigator in Training

Illinois

posts 23

 I still lean towards Grant, Means, Motive and Opportunity.

Regards,

Anthon

5:58 pm
December 27, 2008


Leslie

Investigator

posts 112

A remote control!! That's it! I can't believe that I never thought of this before! (I feel sooooo stupid.) That would make it so much easier for ANYONE to fake this. And almost all cameras now can use a remote.(Sheesh)

11:03 pm
December 29, 2008


A Adams

Guest

Hello! New here.

Any thoughts on why the producers allow all these GH and or Grant "smoking guns" out of their possession to be viewed by the public? Are they really so careless as to not catch them or do they serve to guarantee an audience of both believers who swallow it all and skeptics who watch to play "Gotcha!".

If so, isn't it reasonable to assume these "smoking guns" are staged? Since they draw a wider audience? I just can't imagine any serious "ghost hunter" out there thinking serious paranormal enthusiasts would think entities put on such cheesy shows for humans trying to "interact" with them. Do we get dumber after death?

IMHO It is all Hollywood antics to attract an audience. They give the majority of viewers just what they are looking for (except for those who take the paranormal seriously and get "creeped out" just watching the GH formulaic methodology).

aaAdams

11:12 am
December 30, 2008


SkepticalRader

Investigator

California

posts 38

A Adams, you raise a very valid point about things possibly being staged on purpose. It reminded me of something my wife said to me recently. When I was commenting on the collar pull incident and how blatantly fake it was and how obvious it was that Grant was pulling it off (pun intended), she suggested that it may have been a prank. When I pointed out that it is too late to own up to the prank and what was the purpose of it, she suggested that it may have been done for the benefit of us skeptics? I nearly fell on the floor laughing. It never occurred to me to consider that Jason and Grant may have done this to get the skeptics, like us, wound up. Controversy sells!

1:42 pm
December 30, 2008


A Adams

Guest

"Any thoughts on why the producers allow all these GH and or Grant "smoking guns" out of their possession to be viewed by the public?"

Yeah, quoted myself, sad I know but I wondered if the production crew were the ones in on all this questionable activity, not Grant. Is he being framed (no pun intended)?

These shows go through an awful lot of planning and arranging and scripting to the point it is fairly easy for a seasoned production team to "arrange" about anything. Anything to attract controversy or attention or boost ratings. These people are slick and I  mean slick! They are professionals at manipulating their audience and their "actors" as well. Unless you work on one you really have no idea how much they can control and set up etc. They are also very acute at figuring out who would be their best "victim" to exploit. And with all the takes and set ups and time lags etc it can become very confusing for the "actors" to notice what's goind on right under their own noses. Plus the "actors" aren't even always on set, only when they are needed. Or maybe it is a combination of Grant (he thinks no one knows of his exploits) and production crew (who don't let anyone know of theirs). Just a thought.

5:31 pm
December 30, 2008


Haephiteus

Investigator

Taylor, MI

posts 54

OK, I had a crazy thought.

Here  these guys are, just a couple of plummers, they make a decent living. They both are very serious about the paranormal. They form a group, then run into an awesome deal to make a TV show. Now remember in the early shows, they debunked EVERYTHING or at least had a semi possible explaination, which led them to say it's not paranormal. And if they did find something (rarely) they seriously got excited. The ratings hit the roof and contracts are signed. Now we know they are making a little extra dough. And everybody knows that when you make more money, you spend more money. And when your credit card or house payments etc, are higher, so are the monthly payments. I think everybody knows what I'm getting at.

Let's say this is true, and they are literally STUCK in a bad situation. So an idea would be…. they buy this Bed and Breakfast. They give it a couple of years to get going. Then when contracts are up, tell Pilgrim to stick it in their &$^. Then maybe come clean with the public. And ghost hunt on their own terms and time.

And maybe, just maybe find time to run their own damn website and not a bunch of ding-a-lings who let authority go to their head.

Remember people, It's just a thought of me thinking, "What if this is the case?".


4:48 am
December 31, 2008


Gertrude

Guest

LMC said:

Regarding the 2008 Halloween show, there was a scene early in the evening where Jay and Grant were sitting in a room and getting mysterious knocking replies to their own knocking prompts. Unfortunately I didn't record it and only saw it one time, but on one of these occurrences the camera was on Grant and I swear I saw him blatantly doing the ghostly knocking replies, as if he thought the camera wasn't on him at the time. I've never seen this mentioned on any of the debunking forums, so I've always wondered if I was mistaken. Has anybody got this footage to confirm?


I just watched and  WOW.  I did not catch that and as soon as DD wakes up I'm

going to show her the clip.

9:28 am
December 31, 2008


Camile

Investigator in Training

I'll Believe It When I See It, Texas

posts 23

Haephiteus said:

OK, I had a crazy thought.

Here  these guys are, just a couple of plummers, they make a decent living. They both are very serious about the paranormal. They form a group, then run into an awesome deal to make a TV show. Now remember in the early shows, they debunked EVERYTHING or at least had a semi possible explaination, which led them to say it's not paranormal. And if they did find something (rarely) they seriously got excited. The ratings hit the roof and contracts are signed. Now we know they are making a little extra dough. And everybody knows that when you make more money, you spend more money. And when your credit card or house payments etc, are higher, so are the monthly payments. I think everybody knows what I'm getting at.

Let's say this is true, and they are literally STUCK in a bad situation. So an idea would be…. they buy this Bed and Breakfast. They give it a couple of years to get going. Then when contracts are up, tell Pilgrim to stick it in their &$^. Then maybe come clean with the public. And ghost hunt on their own terms and time.

And maybe, just maybe find time to run their own damn website and not a bunch of ding-a-lings who let authority go to their head.

Remember people, It's just a thought of me thinking, "What if this is the case?".



"WHAM!"

::..the sound of Haephiteus hitting the nail on the head!::   :)

12:34 pm
December 31, 2008


Learjet

Lead Investigator

Australia

posts 655

Haephiteus said:

Then maybe come clean with the public.



Unless they want to be hounded and hated by a large proportion of the public for as long as they live, their deception must never be admitted to.  Ever.


11:55 pm
January 8, 2009


A Adams

Guest

J’s missing flip flop in the Sunshine State Hauntings at the Seven Sisters Inn. Again, Grant was left alone with the objects in question.

I guess it kinda falls between Tier 2 and Tier 3, it is just questionable and in MO the ‘Is Grant a paranormal magnet or something else" category.  I realize there was a cameraman with him but the cameraman points the camera up the staircase and thus is not looking at Grant, plus who knows how long it was between J going up the stairs and G following him. It looks like it was immediate but who knows how long it really was to get the cameraman et al moving up the stairs. There could have been a considerable lag for whatever reason. Plus, we don’t know how far away the room was from G where the missing flip flop was eventually found. And IMO it is just kind of cheesy that J makes a big deal of taking off his flip flops and we get a camera shot of them and then What do you know? One goes missing? Too much of a coincidence for me. But of course proof of nothing other than I am suspicious.

11:40 am
January 11, 2009


T.A.Sharps

Investigator

Iowa

posts 57

Yeah, I always thought it was was weird "Oh, I better take off my flip flops, I don't want to fall down the stairs… make sure you get a camera shot of my flip flops there."

And Grant kinda backs him up "Oh yeah you wanna be safe good idea…"

I never felt unsafe in a pair of flip flops, and if you were going to do a test of running up the staires, and for some reason thought you needed to take off your flip flops, wouldn't you just slip them off without thinking about it much vs making some huge point about why you should take them off, and where you are going to put them?

I think this is one that also points to J being in on the hoaxes.  Reminds me of the episode where the flashlight just happened to jump out of J's hand…

11:33 am
February 8, 2009


Oubliette

Lead Investigator

Land of the Jersey Devil

posts 527

OK, going way back: The Crescent Hotel FLIR anomaly when Jay is supposed to be getting a "mind meld" or something like that.  As Stephen pointed out last summer (Yes, I have a LOT of catching up to do), there's the possibility it was just Grant's finger moving over the lens.

During a browse of the web yesterday I discovered this little gem.  IMO there is no doubt whatsoever that Grant swept his thumb over the lens, and even smiled as he was doing it.  I would say "smoking gun" but unfortunately we do not have the exact moment he did this as Jay and that medium would have been off camera to his left. 

OK, I know that he could have just been adjusting something, but just what would he be adjusting by running his finger across the lens?

Maybe I've grown so jaded with GH that everything looks hoaxed.

BTW, at first I didn't catch it because it's so fast, but by the 3rd time there was no doubt in my mind where that strange "reaching out" color came from.  Many thanks to javadude54, and to Stephen for bringing out the possibility in the first place.

Have a look:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOwvhJwfs0c

Add a New Topic Reply to Post



^ Please Support our Sponsor


Reply to Topic: The Grant List

Guest Name (Required):

Guest EMail (Required):

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of: 5 + 1        (Required)

Topic Reply:


 

Permalink Print
Special thanks to our friends at Red 3 Enterprises, be sure to check out their terrific e-stores.
Copyright 2008 SkepticalViewer.com - The Ghost Hunters Fansite for Skeptics