Thanks Stephen and Eric. I posted the link since i thought people here might like to see what someone else thinks of the show.it's always interesting to see what others think .As far as mentioning the other book by Harriet Beecher Stowe,just wanted to add a fact which few people might be aware of.

I'm interested in all sorts of things. Always been pretty good at Jeopardy.If they come to San Antonio, I may try out.

Eintopy said: I find it funny that they supposedly saw the ghost of Gene Hackman staring through the window when he is still alive and well.  Ghostly doppelgänger, perhaps?  Or maybe just one too many drinks at the bar…

Unless I heard wrong, I'm pretty sure when the fellow said the face he saw looked like Gene Hackman he wasn't actually claiming he saw the ghost of GH or even GH's doppelganger, but rather that the face he saw resembled Gene Hackman. To me it seemed more like a case of using a known personality to describe the face as opposed to trying to describe it [features; hair; shape of the face; age etc]…..doing the former is definitely easier and you at least have others picturing the face the same way.  But that doesn't mean he didn't have a few nips in the bar before he'd seen it, I'm pretty sure he didn't say either way so it's possible that he did.    

Eintopy also said: At the Harriet Beecher Stowe house, one of the things they found during the evidence review was a loud thump.  Tango dismissed it as "just a thump", i.e., nothing paranormal.  But many times before on different episodes, they've heard a thump and presented it to the client as something unexplainable and potentially paranormal.  Is there somehow a difference between "just a thump" and "a ghostly thump"?  Seems silly to me.  The least they could do is attempt to be consistent in what they call paranormal versus an everyday sound.

One of the things that TAPS have shown time and time again, season after season, is that they are definitely stellar at being inconsistent!  Along with the 'thumps' there's been footsteps, voices, moans/groans, scratching and so on which they've [often rather instantly] deemed to be paranormal at one case, then at the next case the same types of things are heard and they dismiss it as something mundane, or will say nothing so basically they ignored it. 

And we've seen plenty of examples where they've obtained near identical evidence – be it a few EVPs, or a door that allegedly opened/closed by itself for e.g. – at two different cases, at one the evidence was enough for them to deem the place haunted but at the other it was only enough to say there appeared to be some sort of PN activity going on – not enough to say H. Go figure. Personally I think, of the cases we've seen, more often than not they went to same with a pre-determined conclusion, actually I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if it was at nearly all if not all, especially the last few seasons….all part of the plan, in the name of ratings, the almighty buck, egos and creating personas. IMHO