| User | Post |
|
1:18 am
August 31, 2010
|
ginrog
| | ginrog | |
| Investigator in Training | posts 9 |
|
|
"…disregarding that non-entity known as a cameraman…" Yes but nosfer if the ghosts can't drain their batteries then they must not be counted. Sure one time a ghost smacked a guy with his own bag (does that sound right?)but he was a sound guy even the ghosts don't notice the cameraman.
|
|
|
7:55 am
August 31, 2010
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
Rev, you forgot to run the mail-merge after you set up the template :)
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
8:38 am
September 5, 2010
|
Liz M
| | NY | |
| Investigator | posts 30 |
|
|
Can anyone explain why the door sound that was caught in Kris and Amy's room while they were sleeping wasn't verified with video? They make a point of saying that they knew the door had to be closed because if it wasn't, they couldn't get a good shot of the room. So…. if the door opened making a noise, wouldn't it have obstructed the view of the videocamera? Even just a little?
It was very diappointing to not see any shadows when the cameras were clearly pointed down the hallway where said shadows were running around. I even rewound the recording and focused on the hallway – nothing.
|
|
|
8:41 am
September 5, 2010
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
Liz M said:
Can anyone explain why the door sound that was caught in Kris and Amy's room while they were sleeping wasn't verified with video? They make a point of saying that they knew the door had to be closed because if it wasn't, they couldn't get a good shot of the room. So…. if the door opened making a noise, wouldn't it have obstructed the view of the videocamera? Even just a little?
See the last part of my post #8 above. They can't have it both ways. If the door in one position would have affected the camera, then the door moving to that position (which, according to them, it did) should have been captured.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
Login 
Register 
The Forum [is where Ancient Roman skeptics hang out.]
Reply to Post
Quote and Reply 
Print this Post 
Topic RSS 
