| User | Post |
|
11:38 pm February 3, 2009
| jaime
| | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
OK ,let me start by saying that I do believe in the paranormal.Yes I do approach the subject w/a healthy bit of skepticism,and yes I started out as a loyal fan of GH…in the beginning! In the past few months though,I have lost faith in their intentions,as each show continuously raises the ante and then folds.
It seems to me that taps has become more laxidazy in their debunking,and too over the top about the actual evidence. The countless sites that claim taps has "sold out" and become frauds, do not help their rep. in the least!(especially when the real evidence proves to point in the direction of trickery lately!) Case in point,"Grant's little jacket pulling friend".PLEEEEASE! I swear I thought Ashton Kutcher was gonna pop out of some dark corner & start slappin hi 5's w/Grant over their cunning wit. Well let me retract that – at least Ashton's punks are believable,which is more than I can say about Grant's little stunt!
Now add to this that they use equipment improperly,have accused their own crew of not analyzing evidence thoroughly,have promoted the "all knowing" Steve to top "Tech God",& added Barry & his "magical equipment" and we have ourselves a plethera of inconsistencies….And we're supposed to trust them & hang on their every word as truth.RIIIIIGHT!
Now my point…has anyone ever watched any given episode of GH,or GHI and caught blatant,obvious evp's that are never mentioned throughout the whole show? What I'm talking about is evp's caught on the sound crew's equipment? I can't tell you how many times that I've been watching GH,& during a tour of the location, or during the reveal I hear these evp's that nobody on the taps crew,or the sci fi sound crew seem to mention or even notice.
Yes I am aware that because it's heard via the sci fi sound crew equipment,that taps themselves may not get a chance to hear this during analysis. It also has not escaped me that usually when I hear these evp's,taps doesn't have their own equipment up & running yet,(like during a tour of the location,or during a reveal.) Nevertheless,why isn't anyone in the sci fi cutting room hearing these evp's ,when splicing all this material together to make a 1 hr show?!It's coming from their own footage that they bring back. I can clearly hear them and I'm a bit hard of hearing. You would think that when something like that shows up,that someone at sci fi would make someone at taps aware of what they've been picking up,so that it could also be used as evidence…right? I mean if the ultimate goal is to sell a show, than sell the damn show!!!
I know,I know…if it's not on taps' footage how can I blame them for not noticing? I don't think one single member of taps or GHI can say that they don't watch their own show.All things aside I know that everyone has an ego,and we all like to feed it when it's hungry.I'm not saying that every member watches every episode,but c'mon they watch.Even if just to poke fun at themselves,or as entertainment during family functions(tell me you can't see Steve or Jay holding a card game and using Brian's "DUDE RUN!" episode as a pick me up during a dull moment!) Or Tango's "tiara walk of shame" as an ice breaker for those cumbersome visits w/the in laws? Hell if I was a friend of theirs, I hardly think I'd be able to help myself from sending everyone boxed season sets as x-mas gifts every year as an ongoing practical joke!(Because usually members of a show get them for free from the network anyway) My point is THEY WATCH. Yet they don't report.You never see a follow up show where the premise is "Hey during some shows we missed some stuff, but sci fi caught it …here it is."
Now take into consideration that on taps own footage there's been an instance or two where they have completely missed an apparition,or face,or orb or something.How in the world does this happen?I don't get it….either they really aren't seeing these things as easily as the viewers,or they're purposely missed or not mentioned. And what would be the point of that? I know I'm not imagining these things because I'm not the only one who notices them.I've been to the taps blog sites,and when anyone tries to report these sitings, they are either quickly kicked off the site and their question deleted,or they're not acknowledged at all(question never makes it on site).Why is this? I'd love to know since the whole purpose of this show is supposed to be"discovery"!
Why are a group of people claiming to be "paranormal investigators" ignoring obvious evidence & seemingly faking other evidence? Well I guess there's lots of reasons-contracts,lawsuits,dropped ratings.but one of those reasons definately isn't integrity!
Over the years, my loyalty to this show has been tested and I've found myself on a soapbox a time or two defending them,"oh but they help people" or "but their main focus is to debunk,not call every little noise a haunting",even found myself uttering the words "paranormal pioneers" or something as equally naive.But in the last month alone since sci fi has run 2 GH marathons & 2 GHI marathons,I've had a chance to watch consecutive episodes,and looking at the bigger picture – This show has turned into a joke!
Now consider for a moment,that for the past few yrs that I have been a fan of this show,I unfortunately did not have a DVR system through my cable co.,since they pretty much wanted all but my first born as payment every month, for ONE DVR box! I've only had a DVR system for about 7 mos now, and wow what an eye opener! This makes a difference because for years I only got to scrutinize their evidence through real-time playback.No rewind or freeze frame,no slow-mo play or even pause.Just the one or two times the network lets you view that clip during the one show a week everyone waited for.When you can only watch a show like this in real time,once a week it becomes easier to accept what your seeing as truth.However,when given the chance to watch episode after episode,w/ rew, freeze-frame,zoom,pause etc.,it's easier to "spot the not" and do your own debunking on their supposed evidence. (which is pretty much the equivalent of looking at the Mona Lisa w/a magnifying glass!)
I guess they could blame the dropped ratings on the invention of the DVR if they wanted to, or they could stop faking evidence,bring the real evidence to light and stop turning a blind eye and a deaf ear to the obvious! I say this reluctantly I might add,because up until recently I really respected this group,and their intentions.I can't say that now. After the last 2 marathons,& the recent 7 months of actually being able to watch & re-watch certain episodes via my DVR,I have to say What an utter disappointment! And what a fool I've been. I honestly don't know who has been MORE blind,deaf and dumb-them or me?!…OK THEM.
Not to mention Grant's latest hoax w/the jacket,his earlier hoax w/the lamp at the Stanley,Jason seeming so supportive of Grant's deceit,(I thought Brian was supposed to be the BIG FAT LIAR of the show?!) Oh that's right ,he quit and came back to fill the position of the GH scapegoat & whipping boy! Whew it's just soooo much b.s. Too much! I guess that's what happens to a show when they when they stop playing for the love of the game,and start playing the game that shows them the money! SAD.
Anyway,just thought i'd share my views on this show to see if anyone has picked up on this very good example of "morphing" if you will ,of a show that started out as one thing only to turn out to be another thing all together?!
Talk about the Helen keller syndrome, they've got it and aren't giving it up any time soon.WHAT A SHAME!
Thanx for hearing me out,all comments welcome from either side of the coin-provided the coin isn't used as a weapon to throw at me! disagree but pls don't hate. thanx a bunch!
|
|
|
1:42 pm February 4, 2009
| blinddog
| | Special Agent Zombie Elimination Agency | |
| Moderator
| posts 857 |
|
|
Don't know about the Helen Keller syndrome(not sure just exactly what that is).
But I will liken GH to the example of the blind squirrel.
However, I'm sure the squirrel had much better luck with acorns than GH has had with the paranormal.
|
Double tap to the head. Don't become Undead.
|
|
|
2:36 pm February 4, 2009
| jaime
| | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
blinddog50 said:
Don't know about the Helen Keller syndrome(not sure just exactly what that is).
But I will liken GH to the example of the blind squirrel.
However, I'm sure the squirrel had much better luck with acorns than GH has had with the paranormal.
Hey Blinddog, thanx for your comment. I agree w/your analogy too.
Helen Keller Syndrome: blind,deaf & dumb – although contrary to the definition itself,Helen Keller actually proved to be a very intelligent woman!
The expression itself is somewhat an oxymoron – kinda like the show.
|
|
|
2:27 am February 5, 2009
| AA Adams
| | |
| Investigator in Training | posts 19 |
|
|
Hi Jaime!
Interesting, can you give specifics on some of the sights and sounds you've noticed that haven't been offered up as evidence?
I'd like to look/listen for them, since I've missed them and can't comment on your OP.
Thanks!
AA
|
|
|
3:28 am February 5, 2009
| jaime
| | |
| Investigator in Training | posts 3 |
|
|
AA Adams said:
Hi Jaime!
Interesting, can you give specifics on some of the sights and sounds you've noticed that haven't been offered up as evidence?
I'd like to look/listen for them, since I've missed them and can't comment on your OP.
Thanks!
AA
Hi there Double A,
Thanx for your comment. I wish I could tell you which exact episodes they were,but unfortunately I do not own any season sets.As I record them on my DVR I will make note of them & get back to you.They are in alot of the reruns,usually during a reveal or tour. Some of the clips used to be on Utube under" How Did Taps Miss This" or similar titles.I wish I could be of more help.I recorded a couple of episodes tonight,I'll watch & post if any of these are the ones in question.
As I was writing the post above,I instantly regreted erasing the last 2 marathons from my DVR ! I knew this question would come up, and then I remembered good 'ole Utube….HAPPY HUNTING! 
|
|
|
9:42 am February 5, 2009
| AA Adams
| | |
| Investigator in Training | posts 19 |
|
|
I tried "how did TAPS or GH miss this" as well as read thru 15 pages of GH titled yt clips and nothing, so maybe someone else who knows how to search a whole lot better than I do (or has more patience ) will post if they find something.
Thanks
AA
|
|
|
10:21 am February 5, 2009
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
Now take into consideration that on taps own footage there's been an instance or two where they have completely missed an apparition,or face,or orb or something
I'd really like to be pointed at some clips of apparitions(!) that they've missed.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
11:27 am February 5, 2009
| bullerspoke
| | Sweden | |
| Investigator | posts 101 |
|
|
I would guess that most "apparitions" people claim TAPS to have missed are instances of matrixing by over-ambitious viewers. People tend to see what they want to see… and especially if that means they spotted something others missed.
(The race to find faces in that famous photograph from the Amityville house is never-ending even though the whole haunting has been wholly debunked as a hoax.)
As for orbs, TAPS under a sudden inexplicable influence of clarity realised orbs are bunk and have stuck with that. Orbs are perhaps the most thouroughly debunked phenomena in modern ghost hunting and TAPS realised it was good PR to distance themselves from the belief in orbs. You know, because they are like skeptics, you know…
|
When in doubt… figure it out!
|
|
|
1:42 pm February 5, 2009
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
I recall the face on the ceiling of the "death chute" during the Halloween episode where viewer after viewer was hitting the button. Pure matrixing.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
7:48 pm February 5, 2009
| jaime
| | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
Hello all,
OMG, you're right AA,they're gone! Utube has yet again removed "controversial" clips from their site.I experienced this a few months back,while searching GH misses to show a friend,& found that out of about 16 or17 clips,only about 9 were still on Utube.To be honest, I haven't looked for them in a while, but I checked Utube after reading your comment,and can only find one under the title "Evidence Ghost Hunters Missed".But don't bother,when you click on it, it displays "This Video Has Been Rmoved",and takes you into GH hoax's.I didn't put a whole lot of time into searching,(son came home from school)but tonight I'll look a little harder for ya.Sorry.
Bullerspoke, a good amount of of the paranormal societies do believe in orbs,Although they pose controversy on GH.Now I'm not going to say that every orb is paranormal activity,-some spirit or ghost.But I am willing to concede that they are more than just dust.The theory I support the most is the energy theory.The thing that I don't understand is this:If we are supposed to be energy & our bodies the capsules that harnesses that energy,then when the body dies the energy has to go somewhere right?Well why then is it so easy to accept that the energy can show itself in an apparition,or mist,or evp or something of the like,but not an orb? You would think that it takes far more energy to manifest into a shadow,app,or audible voice,than it does to manifest into a little ball of light.I think orbs are one of the purest forms of the energy that can come through to our dimension,w/out having to morph into anything more physical.I believe that they can manifest into something more physical looking,but that they don't have to to be seen.
No this does not mean that I think every little ball of light is aunt Millie, or the guy that used to live next door,but I do have to consider that there are more ways to visit this dimension, than just through physical morphing into something that resembles objects we are more used to seeing.Now I ask ya,(w/no disrespect intended)If other light anomalies like streaks & glowing hues of ambient light(like past a doorway in another room, the room itself seems to glow) are accepted as paranormal anomalies,then why isn't showing up in a concentrated ball of energy as accepted?
I'm not an expert & never claimed to be, but I think even I could tell the difference between dust & a ball of light.Especially if in some cases it will follow someone step by step,or travel from one person to another, or even follow a specific pattern.Orbs have also been seen moving lightning fast, or at least fast enough to dis count it as dust.
As far as over-ambitious viewers go,yes I will conciede that THEY too exist,however I am not one of them. I don't jump the couch over every little piece of evidence,It takes quite a bit to convince me that something is on the up & up.
And yes Bullerspoke,I do agree w/you that some of these reported misses, are viewers being over- ambitious,but that's not always the case.
Thanx for the comments guys…until we mee again-Jaime-
|
|
|
9:37 pm February 5, 2009
| Stephen
| | San Jose, CA | |
| Admin
| posts 589 |
|
|
Hi jaime and all,
Most of the GH-related YouTube entries got taken down a while back due to copyright issues. Some of the older episodes are up on hulu, I think.
Jaime, I appreciate and thank you for your comments. I can't prove that all orbs are dust, or aren't paranormal, but I don't find them to be impressive evidence. In the spirit of civil debate, let me pick some nits with your arguments.
Personally, I'm not terribly swayed by what paranormal societies do or do not believe in, so inconsistencies in their standards of evidence don't keep me up at night.
The problem with the "moved too fast to be dust" argument is that it's hard to tell exactly how far away an orb was from the camera lens. Did it zoom across the screen because it was going like a bat out of hell, or was it just right in front of the lens and moved about an inch? If an orb passes behind an object of known distance, then we could calculate its speed, but otherwise it's unknown.
Orb movements are also tough to use as proof. If you were able to get an orb to trace complex geometric figures on command, I'd be seriously impressed. Random motions can seem very purposeful, though– I remember at least once when the smoke from a campfire seemed to follow me as I moved to try to escape it.
You say that you can tell the difference between a speck of dust and a ball of light. I'm with you on one thing: I don't think that all orbs are specks of dust either. They can be caused by (among other things) raindrops, mist, insects, or lens flare.
We could debate generalities all day, but perhaps you'd be willing to provide some links to pictures or videos of orbs and the reasons why you believe that they or their activities are paranormal?
|
Stephen the Friendly Skeptic
|
|
|
2:01 am February 6, 2009
| Revenant
| | Hopelessly Locked In A "Fear Cage" | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1393 |
|
|
jaime said:
Well why then is it so easy to accept that the energy can show itself in an apparition,or mist,or evp or something of the like,but not an orb? You would think that it takes far more energy to manifest into a shadow,app,or audible voice,than it does to manifest into a little ball of light.I think orbs are one of the purest forms of the energy that can come through to our dimension,w/out having to morph into anything more physical.
Hello Jaime and welcome.
I do not wish to be argumentative but I have always questioned the Orb. I am not speaking in terms of whether I believe in ghosts or not or even what they represent. My question has always been the actual shape. That is what fascinates me.
It is interesting that you use the term "energy" as opposed to ghost, so I will go with it (not judging, just agreeing upon termonology ). If the argument is that it takes "far more energy" to manipulate light (shadows, apparition) or sound waves (EVP's) than it does to create a sphere of pure energy, then I would respectfully disagree.
I can create very low tech experiments to manipulate light and sound. Free-floating spheres of energy? I wouldn't even know where to start on that one. Typical, the energy that we can see with our own eyes is electricity. When it travels, it usually travels in an arc. Watch some lightning or simply rub your feet on the carpet and touch the dog (yeah, my dog LOVES that…). Fire "can" form a floating sphere (sort of), but only in zero gravity.
Then there's the speed. They just…float. Um, energy doesn't just float. If there was such a thing as a self contained ball of energy (I mean proven by science), that thing would be traveling at eye-popping speed. Odds are we probably wouldn't be able to see it, nor..probably, would we want to. It would be extremely dangerous.
So…for me at least, I just can't get past how any form of energy could be self-contained (no arcs) and not adhere to any laws of gravity (shape or movement).
Overall, I agree with Stephen's post on other alternatives. It's just that the shape of orbs and the ideas of what energy is and does has always bothered me a little bit. Again, not trying to pick on Jaime, just addressing the topic of orbs as I see it.
|
"Skepticism is not a position, it's a process." -Dr Michael Shermer
|
|
|
2:21 am February 6, 2009
| bullerspoke
| | Sweden | |
| Investigator | posts 101 |
|
|
Well, that people believe in orbs, and especially those who belong to paranormal societies is not surprising, however, it says nothing about orbs as such. People believe many things often contradictory to what other people think. And that's ok. But belief is one thing, fact another. And the facts are that orbs are a known artifact from photography, there is really no mystery here, it is easily repeatable and explainable. Does that mean that all orbs are artifacts and there is never an orb-like anomali that might be paranormal? Well, in essence, yes. And those who claim it to be paranormal have the burden of proof. While the paranormal is always possibility it also needs to be backed up with some proof. And yet, none such exist to date that trumps the non-paranormal explanation when it comes to orbs.
As for energy, energy does not travel in little balls of light, or in a cloud. Energy is a measure of matters ability to do "work", for example in a contracted spring. A contracted spring has a measure of energy that enables it to lift/push other items. The energy beings (often in light or cloud-form) of science fiction are truly intriguing but says little of the nature of energy. With that siad, I am no physicist, only a layman and couldn't even if i wanted to really truly explain what energy is, I have to rely on what science seems to say. But as far where the energy goes when we die, I would say most of it simply move to other matter, like in the decomposing of a corpse that brings growth to plants and food for insects.
Overambitious viewers or not, of course TAPS misses stuff at times, yet I have a hard time believing that they miss much of importance. But of course it might happen, it is not always matrixing or overambition, but I would guess 99 percent are. I mean I have seen every friggin' episode of GH, :) except the halloween live events, and I have yet to see something TAPS missed or didn't see. Sometimes I don't agree on what they see, but I never have seen something truly anomalous that TAPS did not acknowledge or debunked.
|
When in doubt… figure it out!
|
|
|
3:14 am February 6, 2009
| AA Adams
| | |
| Investigator in Training | posts 19 |
|
|
Okay, new to "orbs" but I seem to remember an episode (of I'm sure GH) spending some time discussing traveling "orbs" on some video evidence. I can see a wall and a doorway and I think it was daylight. Can anyone point me to the episode so i can rewatch it. I thought I remembered them as being all excited about it, but me memory ain't what it used to be !
Thanks
AA
|
|
|
8:07 am February 6, 2009
| jaime
| | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
To all above,
Wow! If I thought that typing the word orb would cause so much discussion, I would have written a post on that alone! I really appreciate all of your comments. I will try to address all.
First let me start by saying this, I have actually seen orbs w/the naked eye. I was not alone when this happened, (not meant as proof to you,but as validation to me that I wasn't crazy at the time, as BOTH of us saw it).
conditions: Indoors, temp.around 68 deg., still night-no wind, no open windows, too warm for heat, too cool for central air, no fan was running, furnace fan was not on auto circulating air, it was not raining in my house, nor was it snowing, or misting, yes, dust exists in my home the same as everyone Else's.
Incident: While sitting on my couch reading, I saw a sparkle of light shoot from my floor in the living rm., diagonally across the rm into my Fourier, I didn't even have time to say anything before my bother (who was sitting next to me strumming his guitar) said "Did you just see that?" Before I could respond it shot out of the Fourier, across the room & disappeared into thin air about 3 ft from a wall. My cat was in that purr-trance state where they're just ready to nod off. When the orb initially shot up from the floor, my cat was laying about 2 ft away from it . It startled her so bad, that when she shot up to dart out of the room, she scratched my hard wood floor! She then proceeded to stand at the entrance of the living room, hair standing on end, haunched back, ears back, bearing teeth and making a sound that I've NEVER heard from her before or since. It was only after that, that I finally said "Yes I saw that too, how many times did you see it?" He answered "Twice".
For the rest of the night my cat refused to come into the living room, 2 days later she peed on the very spot the orb shot out from (3yr.old cat – well past litter trained – never peed out of place before or since).
Facts: Couldn't have been caused by TV glare – TV was off. Couldn't have been caused by outdoor interference, as we had shades – not blinds & lived off a private road (only traffic is ours & we were in). Instead of looking like it shot say across a wall, it actually moved through the open atmosphere of the room.Was not lens flare, as we weren't running a recorder or a still cam. It was about 2-2 & a half inches in diameter & had a faint tail if you will, following behind it (but the tail only appeared as it shot out the second time before it disappeared into the air). Cat got scared by something, & it wasn't my reading, or the guitar playing.That was the only time I've ever seen a cat act like a dog! It wasn't dust, as I don't know of any glowing dust particles almost 3 inches in diameter - that exists in any one's household (visible to the naked eye or any camera).
Now, am I posing this as evidence? Of course not only an idiot would try that. But it is THE reason I choose to believe that there's more to orbs than people think. And no one will convince me otherwise. FYI: I used to laugh at the thought of orbs…before that night.
Since then I have tried to be open minded, allowing my perception to broaden my reality (no I don't mean that the other way around).
So now, with that personal experience shared by not just one person, but 2 intelligent rational minded people, not to mention a practically sleeping cat, coupled w/the basic laws of quantum physics, which is that everything has a frequency, a vibration, an ENERGY,- I don't really feel that there is even a debate. Every thing is energy; you, me, the floor you stand on, the bed you sleep in, the food you eat ,the thoughts you think - Everything!!! I don't have to prove that, science has already done that for me. All I have to do is take the basic laws of quantum physics and apply them to whats being recorded as apparitions, mists, orbs, EVP'S, ITC, whatever you consider paranormal activity. It isn't complicated. It's all the same thing - energy. Different frequencies, different vibrations. It's all relative!!!
I think that if people better understood what energy was, and the minutia of how it works, they might not be so quick to argue what forms it's capable of showing up in.
Take the quartz for example, energy rock. Has a constant vibration of what – energy. And such a concentration of it mind you, that it is used to keep time. And a very regular,steady, consistent vibration of energy. With that in mind, I'll address a few points that were made.
— "As for energy, energy does not travel in little balls of light, or in a cloud. Energy is a measure of matters ability to do "work", for example in a contracted spring. A contracted spring has a measure of energy that enables it to lift/push other items. The energy beings (often in light or cloud-form) of science fiction are truly intriguing but says little of the nature of energy. With that siad, I am no physicist, only a layman and couldn't even if i wanted to really truly explain what energy is, I have to rely on what science seems to say. But as far where the energy goes when we die, I would say most of it simply move to other matter, like in the decomposing of a corpse that brings growth to plants and food for insects."—
I hardly think that someone who can't tell me how energy works,could tell me exactly how fast it would move (travel) in one form or another. Since you say you have to rely on what science says…here's a little science for ya.
Physicists have proven that everything in our world is made up of sub-atomic particles of vibrating energy. Your entire body is a mass of vibrating energy. This is fact of quantum science.
This energy of your mind and body creates an electro-magnetic field which results in your personal 'life vibration frequency.' YOU send out energy waves on a particular frequency. This frequency you emit determines the level, and type, of experiences that you attract into your life. It determines the life you are now living.
That may sound a little 'out there' so let's look at a simplified example that will help you understand this…it may sound complicated, but if you follow along you will understand the principles…
If you put your finger under a powerful microscope you will see it magnified enough to detect the individual cells that make up your skin. By switching to a more powerful microscope you can see the individual molecules that make up the cells. Using yet another more powerful microscope you will be able to see the atoms that make up the molecules. Going further, and using yet another more powerful microscope you will break the atoms down into protons, neutrons, and electrons (sub-atomic particles). Sub-atomic particles are energy. What you see as your finger is, in reality, a constantly vibrating movement, a form of energy.THIS IS A PROVEN FACT & IS BASIC KNOWLEDGE TO ANY PHYSICIST OR QUANTUM PHYSICIST!
In its physical form it's your finger. In it's 'true' life form your finger is made up of vibrating energy. YOU are made up of vibrating energy! Everything in this world is made of vibrating energy. If you look at a wooden table under the various microscopes you will again see the sub-atomic particles and vibrating energy. This is hard for most people to accept, but it is fact and if you want to research quantum science, you will find it to be true.
This vibrating energy 'oscillates' at different intensity (frequency) levels according to your thoughts and emotions. These 'levels of vibrating energy' that you emit outward, attract similar levels of vibrational energy. Hence, some being more prone to see or experience the paranormal, & the different frequencies it emanates (like animals or sensitives).
I hope that this has cleared up some confusion on how I could possibly come to the conclusion that orbs are"little balls of energy floating around".Or why I use the word energy instead of ghost, spirit etc. IT'S ALL ENERGY. I may have misspoke when I used "floating" to describe movement.
Thank you all for your well thought out points, but I'm sticking to science and what I know to be fact.The same energy exists in many different forms all over the universe, and it's up to us to change our perception of the bigger picture of reality, to allow ourselves to understand it's possibilities.
Thank you all, you're a great bunch to debate with…definately keeping me on my toes!!!
Stephan, I do have some interesting links for you,I just need to go into my files & retrieve them.I'll post them this afternoon.
Bye Guys - -
|
|
|
10:27 am February 6, 2009
| Patrick
| | |
| Investigator | posts 190 |
|
|
Hey Blinddog, thanx for your comment. I agree w/your analogy too.
Helen Keller Syndrome: blind,deaf & dumb – although contrary to the definition itself,Helen Keller actually proved to be a very intelligent woman!
The expression itself is somewhat an oxymoron – kinda like the show.
Jamie, you do realize that "dumb" in that instance means mute, and not stupid, right?
|
|
|
11:30 am February 6, 2009
| jaime
| | |
| Investigator in Training | posts 3 |
|
|
Yes Patrick-
I certianly did realize that, that is exactly why I wrote : "Contrary to the definition itself (blind,deaf &dumb),Helen Keller was actually a very intelligent woman."
Dumb: unable to speak; uneducated.- via Webster's -
In her time,being mute wasn't recognized as being asscioated w/deafness, or even a handycap for that matter.It was highly mistaken as a mental inability, instead of a physical limitation. Mute some many yrs back was mistaken as, for lack of a better term – dumb -…uneducated – not educated enough to know how to speak. This would be why I placed the "contradictory aside" directly after the definition in the first place.
Thanx tho,I do appreciate those comments…..no matter how redundant .
|
|
|
11:12 pm February 6, 2009
| Stephen
| | San Jose, CA | |
| Admin
| posts 589 |
|
|
Hi jaime,
I appreciate this discussion– I don't get to discuss quantum physics very often, and it's fun. That said, let's keep the volume down and make sure that everyone stays well away from the personal-attack button. I don't want to have to lock a thread with so much potential.
As you point out, your orb experience explains why you take your position, but by itself is not compelling evidence. I've learned from kicking around here that it's often impossible to analyze people's stories. So I accept that it had a strong effect on you, but it doesn't give me the compelling evidence I'm looking for.
There are a few points where we agree. Matter and energy are the same thing (or different states of the same thing)– that's classical relativity, not just quantum physics. Quanta are both particles and waves, and hence everything has a wavelength.
We have some good solid disagreements as well, though.
You claim that "This vibrating energy 'oscillates' at different intensity (frequency) levels according to your thoughts and emotions." If that comes from accepted quantum physics, I'd like to see the citation. As far as I know, the particles in our bodies don't know or care that they're part of a larger organism. Quantum mechanics says that they act the same whether they're part of you, me, a tree, or a rock. In fact, quantum field theory relies on the fact that all particles of a given kind are absolutely identical.
Quartz does vibrate when you zap it with electricity, but that doesn't make it "energy rock". Unless you're running an electric current through it, it doesn't vibrate on its own any more than any other kind of rock. We use it for watches, not because it's magic, but because it's the most common piezoelectric crystal.
In the end, though, I'm looking for evidence. I haven't seen any evidence for the "energy waves" you say we're constantly emitting. I haven't seen any orb footage where an orb proves itself to be something particularly exotic. I look forward to your links– please let me know, when you post them, exactly what about them shows that these are not ordinary objects.
|
Stephen the Friendly Skeptic
|
|