| User | Post |
|
5:40 am
October 31, 2009
|
blinddog
| | Special Agent Zombie Elimination Agency | |
| Moderator
| posts 857 |
|
|
Darth Vader said, "You guys are skeptics". "Wahahahaha".
Jason said the courthouse ghost was a 'phase one spirit'.
They have phases? They metamorphosize like moths and butterflies?
Wouldn't the term 'class one spirit' be more appropriate?
Goobers.
|
Double tap to the head. Don't become Undead.
|
|
|
6:15 am
October 31, 2009
|
alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
Okay, here is the video of Kris and Amy's (and Jason & Grant) visit to the The Maury Show. Enjoy? 
|
|
|
7:54 am
October 31, 2009
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
blinddog50 said:
Darth Vader said, "You guys are skeptics". "Wahahahaha".
Jason said the courthouse ghost was a 'phase one spirit'.
They have phases? They metamorphosize like moths and butterflies?
Wouldn't the term 'class one spirit' be more appropriate?
Goobers.
It might be more appropriate but that is predicated entirely on the fact that he actually would know what he's talking about!
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
11:01 am
October 31, 2009
|
BrendaLee
| | Thousand Oaks, CA | |
| Investigator | posts 85 |
|
|
@ alicat – thanks for the footage. There's not much to it, though, is there?
My husband wandered through the room while I was watching the Today show footage and said – softball questions, huh?
I wondered about J and G's quick denial that the EMF represents ghosts at all. J scoffed at that idea and said it was just the fluctuations bothering people. So…do we need the K2s anymore? The professionals have made it clear they only measure EMF and not ghosts.
|
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." – Dr. Seuss
|
|
|
11:06 am
October 31, 2009
|
alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
Actually I wasn't going to even post it. Later after thinking about it, I figured everyone should take a look at basically a non-event.
|
|
|
11:16 am
October 31, 2009
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
Well, no different than the Today show one then
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
11:19 am
October 31, 2009
|
alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
|
11:27 am
October 31, 2009
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
At least Maury wasn't dressed as Yoda.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
11:28 am
October 31, 2009
|
alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
Kris and Amy weren't dressed as paranormal investigators either. 
|
|
|
11:30 am
October 31, 2009
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
And no advertising in either
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
11:35 am
October 31, 2009
|
alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
I was going to edit my comment but I figured you'd add that fact. I guess they figure no one would understand except their rabid fans or those of us here. Probably just as well. I'm guessing they would have to bar the photo because of advertising purposes and that would be distracting which is not what these shows want (well….. maybe Maury).
|
|
|
11:42 am
October 31, 2009
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
Possibly the "weren't allowed" choice…One of Jason's said Spalding Inn in big letters so there wouldn't have been much doubt…The "S" we've seen could easily get confused for the Sheraton.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
11:46 am
October 31, 2009
|
alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
You're right. That brings up an interesting legal question. I'm going to check into that. Thanks for giving me a new project. 
|
|
|
11:47 am
October 31, 2009
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
The other option is that they WERE wearing Sheraton sweatshirts and thought everyone would assume the S stood for Spalding.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
11:55 am
October 31, 2009
|
alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
Logo is close but no cigar. They just beefed up the Sheraton's. I guess they they it's more classy that way. Not so sure anyone would make that mistake once they got there though especially considering The Doctor's thread on the May 2009 Boot Camp. Yuck!
|
|
|
12:00 pm
October 31, 2009
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
With the wreath it might be close enough for infringement
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
12:06 pm
October 31, 2009
|
alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
Not so sure but interesting in the fact that they are two lodging establishments. How'd I do on that? I'll check further but that's probably the only way it could be construed I think. You know how they like to get very close to the line and not quite step over it when they can be sued. Can you say TAPSCON. Fringe and thisssssss close.
|
|
|
12:16 pm
October 31, 2009
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2957 |
|
|
Probably not an issue if they had a hardware store but same business is questionable. According to the US Patent and Trademark Office http://www.uspto.gov/smallbusiness/trademarks/faq.html:
"The principal factors considered by the examining attorney in determining whether there would be a likelihood of confusion are:
the similarity of the marks; and
the commercial relationship between the goods and/or services listed in the application.
To find a conflict, the marks do not have to be identical, and the goods and/or services do not have to be the same. It may be enough that the marks are similar and the goods and/or services related."
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
12:26 pm
October 31, 2009
|
alicat
| | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1215 |
|
|
Interestingly, in some places there is a trademark on their (Sheraton) logo and others not. I look into it further.
|
|
Login 
Register 
The Forum [is where Ancient Roman skeptics hang out.]
Reply to Post
Quote and Reply 
Print this Post 
Topic RSS 
