| User | Post |
|
8:52 am July 7, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
Tonight's episode is Finals at the Stanley Hotel. If I recall correctly, there are still three investigators and Michelle has been foreshadowed to be on shaky ground.
The "little blurb" says:
'Steve and Tango send the students to Estes Park, Colorado, to investigate the possibility of paranormal activity inside The Stanley Hotel, a138-room Georgian hotel that served as the inspiration for author Stephen King's horror novel "The Shining."'
Steve and Tango send…send…does that mean Steve and Tango are not going? Personally I think that could get really interesting, but we'll know for sure in another couple hours.
Three students in the finals…doesn't sound like it will be Steve with one and Tango with the other, then, though that would be a good way to assess.
The Stanley…GH has visited this place multiple times and we've never been disappointed with the results. Okay, maybe we've been disappointed, but there have always been "results" I wonder what our students shall find.
 
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
6:23 pm July 7, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
The shark is about 85 feet under this part of the franchise, too, now. They are all going to have to be given spots on GH to buy their silence on the flashlight trick. Oh, their first real paranormal activity happening to them and that's all the reaction we get? Ha! Oh, and let's leave now…well why not, that's part of the GH method of investigating. Sheesh :(
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
6:28 pm July 7, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
Oh and it's room 401 with the activity, why do they keep saying and showing 412?
Edited:Well because there IS supposed activity in 412! I missed 412 because when they were listing off the cameras they had not put one in 412, but that was only because no 'apparitions' were seen in 412.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
10:36 pm July 7, 2010
| Learjet
| | Australia | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1122 |
|
|
Nosfer said:
The shark is about 85 feet under this part of the franchise, too, now.
Hehheh. Can't wait to see it. Cartoon linky. I hope Homer doesn't mind that he lost his head.
http://yfrog.com/45ghjumpsharkj
|
|
|
|
|
5:47 am July 8, 2010
| Eric
| | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
"When in doubt, throw it out…"???? So, J is going back on his mantra when it comes to ambiant environmental issues? I felt as pissed off as Adam did about that.
Adam listened to 3 hours of pops and silence on a stationary tape in a room…and J was lambasting him about not paying attention?
Can't be paranormal if it's the same thing over and over and over…like maybe the wood popping and shifting since it's COLD OUTSIDE!!
I do have to say Adam was the best when it came to trying different techniques and certainly paying close attention to what is going on around him. The quasi Era Cue was great I thought. Not sure if anyone else used that or not, but good call on his part to do something other than the flashlight.
|
|
|
6:23 am July 8, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
Adam was rightfully upset, that "EVP" in the room was of the BS type. And Adam is exactly right also on the audio matrixing (something I've been hammering at for several seasons when it comes to some of these "EVPs" they trot before us) I suspect that whole bit of nonsense was scripted into the scene to set up the possibility that there was no shoe-in so they could squeeze another 53 seconds of drama out of this thing. Ooooh, Adam missed evidence, he might NOT win it afterall!
Speaking of that, Adam also said that after about 3 hours you start doing that. I suspect it starts happening even before that, but okay, 3 hours. Essex that they showed last night…if you start missing things after 3 hours and if you start re-reviewing and cleaning audio etc, there were probably 100 hours of review EACH for Steve and Tango (4 stationary cams, 4 audio with each, Pylgrym footage from each team, DV and audio that each team was carrying etc) Both Steve and Tango are wearing the same shirts for ALL of the review AND the findings. This episode of GH sponsored by SpeedStick!
Back to this episode's EVP that was "thrown out" The "Good Morning" one. If this was supposedly an isolated environment, and you have something that clear (this was an EVP I actually understood the words to!) then where did it come from? If it wasn't the Cadets and it wasn't Steve/Tango playing a trick, WHO was having the conversation? Something is fishy…maybe it's that shark that's 85 feet under the show.
Learjet…you may need to alter that one to show the Cadets lol, although since this is a Jason franchise that cartoon does capture it well!!
Regarding the SFT (Stupid Flashlight Trick) Adam showed more excitement winning the "game" and being able to go look for ghosts with the GH team than he showed when they actually FOUND and INTERACTED with a ghost (allegedly) More fish.
Witness the excitement he and Michelle showed initially with the thermal image last week. Excitement which was genuine, you could tell. Now compare that to the excitement all three showed this week when they were getting definite responses during the SFT. I bet every one of them has their blood pressure, adrenaline, and excitement level go up higher when their Toaster Strudel finally pops up for their morning breakfast than what it did when the light went on and off.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
6:30 am July 8, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
And another thing! They are going on the walk through and get to the room Jason was in where the closet door opened. In the "flashback" they show him setting the camera on the night stand pointed at the upper half of the door, the bottom part conveniently blocked by the foot of the bed. And then the door closes. Cut to present day.
Prime example of them using evidence that should be thrown out…a tact that Jason agreed with Eric on in the first(?) episode this half-season. You can't see the whole door. Eric should have gone out in style and yelled "But you can't see the whole door, why are you guys using this as evidence? Sheesh…Adam, you can have it, I'm not working with these guys!" And then stormed out. That would have been good. But, alas, such was not to be.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
7:06 am July 8, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
|
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
8:29 am July 8, 2010
| Eric
| | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
Seems SOMEONE is on a little soapbox now eh? :)
FYI: I am registered on here, but I am too Krys Gartland to redo my login info…
Should it be more appropriate to do so I will redo my login asap :)
|
|
|
8:51 am July 8, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
Eric said:
Seems SOMEONE is on a little soapbox now eh? :)
Who, ME??? :) To paraphrase John Paul Jones "I have not yet begun to point out the problems with this episode" lol
This episode really just rubbed me the wrong way on many levels. The introduction of the flashlight schtick was just…. That dead-noise EVP? Michelle forgetting her EMF detector? What about her handy-dandy pink GHA backpack? Shouldn't it have been in there? Why would she have had it out when they were setting up Ops? The detector omission wasn't perhaps scripted in, was it?
Funny how they proved that the EMFs are useless in this episode. Observe the bed scene where the light turns on…I will have to review the evidence again but I did not see any fluctuation in EMF when the light went on. Did anyone else see it register?
But…wasn't Adam(?) saying in a previous episode that all the ghost had to do was come near "this little device" and he would know it was present? Apparently not, apparently the ghosts can only interact with the K2 type detector.
Can someone bring me another soapbox? This one isn't high enough :)
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
8:58 am July 8, 2010
| Eric
| | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
The EMF's were all baseline: .01 or .02…no fluctuations at all. NONE.
I can forgive Michelle for forgetting her EMF in a different room. Some people get nervous around the Boss no matter how long one's been on the job.
The backpack I think would have been for items that weren't constantly being used?…(camcorder, level, notebook, brain) Scripting? Bad editing/continuity? Perhaps.
I wasn't really fond of the consistent Flashlight Technique either. Eric summed it up while observing…"Hmm..Interesting," he deadpanned.
With ZERO EMF fluctuations during the Lord Fauntleroy (or whatever his name was) call out and interactions, I can't be happy with the "personal experience" storyline concerning said flashlight.
|
|
|
9:25 am July 8, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
Well there has never been any proof shown that the ghost WOULD cause a disturbance in the Force, er, Field. But they do put that out there as fact in previous episodes. ("all you have to do is come close to this thingy and we'll know you're here") So we have two possibilities based upon what we saw:
- They are correct about ghosts affecting the field, in which case the SFT was faked.
- They are incorrect about ghosts affecting the field, in which case the SFT is ambiguous, BUT then all their other sessions where the ghosts causes K2 action are also then faked because of their incorrect assumption about ghosts generating a field in the first place.
The bit about Michelle and the EMF detector…I meant why would it have been out of her backpack when setting up Central Command in the first place? Everything was originally contained in the backpack when they were issued…I just don't see it having been used when setting up Central Command. It just seemed too convenient. A failing of hers, then we have the trumped up failure of Adam in Evidence Review. I don't know for certain, obviously, but when you start to look at all these things in the big-picture sense…it doesn't come off well. I mean, when Jason has to memorize the line "Well, what about Adam?" :) (listen to his intonation) I have to wonder how far that goes.
A question now, for our resident expert on EMF (whom I have a lot more faith in than any of the folks we saw in last night's episode!) Learjet…given the type of meter being used and it's positioning next to the flashlight, would the activation of the bulb be an action that would cause any registering on the detector? ie, would turning on a flashlight next to that type of detector give a "hit"?
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
9:49 am July 8, 2010
| Judy Holiday
| | |
| Guest
| |
|
|
I find it amazing at how nonchalant these ppl act on this show.Honestly if I was to have the "flashlight" experience I would be freaking out big time (lol) but they were acting like it was an everyday deal to have their flashlight go on and off by itself. Not to mention it was happening when they were asking questions to some ghost that was supposedly floating all around them.I"ve lost all respect for these ppl and if they really think that the public is buying the kind of BS that they were trying to sale last night then they are seriously brain dead.I almost felt embarrassed for the "Newbies" who would go along with the lies just to get a spot on this show.But then I thought about how noone was twisting their arms to be so dishonest and if they have no remorse then I say enjoy.One thing is for sure and that is I'm through watching all of this nonsense and I'm also sure that I am not the only one so they better enjoy their new fame while they can because I can't see Ghost Hunters lasting much longer.
|
|
|
10:06 am July 8, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
Absoflippinlutely amazing if true, and it was just blipped over in the "Present our findings to Jason and hope he is impressed" section. No "We've had that happen to us, too" from Jason. No "Well done! you really caught something!" No "Giddy anticipation of what Jason will think of us for getting some real evidence finally" No….well, no Nothing! Oh, there was something… "Adam, you didn't bring us this 3 hours of hiss on the tape"
It's very interesting to compare incidents where the teams are truly caught off guard and truly are excited vs reactions during stunts like the STF.
There are a few episodes that I really have problems with: The Manson Episode, The Halloween Episode at Fort Delaware, The Hanger Toss, and Belcourt Castle really stand out (I'm sure there are others but these especially) BTW, Belcourt wasn't for allegedly faked evidence, it was for gross incompetence in analyzing the evidence. For the record, I don't think there was anything really under-handed going on there. I have to add this one onto that list.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
3:37 pm July 8, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
Flashlight scene, really bad editing…if anyone has recorded it, take a look at this scene:
They move the flashlight over to the window. They do the little bit about if you're sleepy and turn it on one more time we'll leave you alone.
They show Eric leaning against the window frame and he says:
"If you can turn it on by the time we count to three, then we'll stay."
Scene now shows Eric again leaning against the window frame, shining flashlight at the tricky flashlight. And Michelle is on the bed on the far right of the screen. The light from Eric's flashlight is bathing the tricky flashlight.
He starts to count: "One, Two…"
At two, moves his light off so you can see the tricky flashlight itself. Pay attention to this shot, it is only shown for 5 frames (1/6th second at 30fps)
The flashlight head is pointing to the RIGHT (at the EMF detector) and is a full flashlight length AWAY from the meter.
Then a few frames and "Three"
In this shot, the flashlight has REVERSED direction and is pointing AWAY from the EMF detector, and is only about 1/4 or less of a flashlight length away from the EMF detector. Nothing happens, ie the light doesn't go on, but there is obviously some switcheroo stuff going on here.
Oh, speaking of editing, love the outside shots with all the snow on the ground and snow falling…looked pretty non-snowy when they got there! Oh, yeah, no snow when they leave, either…quick storm!
Edited: More editing fun. The light comes on for the first time and it's over a second and a half before Michelle sucks in her breath and goes "uhhhhh"
Eric says nothing until after the "uhhhhh" (and that is just to say very unenthusiastically, "wow that's interesting")
Problem is that, even though we don't SEE them when the flashlight comes on, we should HEAR them…and we don't for another second and a half!!
Another Edit: They go to the next room and we interestingly have a sequence where the flashlight turns on twice in a row (it's turned on, shown on, then shown off and no one is near it, then Adam has Dunraven turn it on again at Eric's command)
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
4:54 pm July 8, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
More discontinuity, about 25 minutes in (counting commercials) Michelle is sitting on the bed in the Bachelors area. There is an alarm clock on the night stand which is obviously on (you can see the bright numbers indicating the time) Then there is a 'whoa did you hear that' and the camera quickly pans…no Michelle, clock lights off, alarm clock in different locations (but Michelle's voice present) It then jumps to Eric standing and an "aside" with Michelle and then Eric is shown again and you can see the alarm clock…time visible (clock is on) Very likely from "filler roll B" spliced in just like the SWBT (Stupid Water Bottle Trick) when Meatloaf was with them.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
6:23 pm July 8, 2010
| Learjet
| | Australia | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1122 |
|
|
Nosfer said:
Learjet…given the type of meter being used and it's positioning next to the flashlight, would the activation of the bulb be an action that would cause any registering on the detector? ie, would turning on a flashlight next to that type of detector give a "hit"?
Quick answer, yes it is possible.
More in depth answer, it depends on the sensitivity of the EMF meter, the type of flashlight used and the proximity to the EMF meter.
Even more in depth answer. I've run a few tests using various AC EMF meters, Gauss Master, our beloved K-II, Trifield natural and a waterfall spectrograph. I don't have the exact model they use on GHA, but the specs from memory are in the 30-300 Hertz range with some residual sensitivity to 800 Hertz. Quite similar to the K-II in EMF mode, though the K-II also has added radio sensitivity further up the spectrum.
The flashlights with internal electronics to regulate voltage and that have fancy switching modes tend to produce a wider spray of EMF than a plain on/off flashlight. The plain flashlight will produce spikes also, as the micro arcing at the switch produces quite a wide range of frequencies like static from a mini lightning bolt.
I can't be sure but the flashlight on this GHA episode looks like it might be a mini maglite. I don't have one of those, but I do have a plain incan 3D to test, along with a CR123 powered ultrafire cree and a 12 LED "Ghost 2". This probably covers most flashlight types used in investigations.
All of them produce EMF spikes, it's just a matter of getting them close enough to register. My waterfall spectrogram meter with magnetic induction coil is the most sensitive of all the meters. It will detect a plain non electronic flashlight up to about 1 foot away. The Gauss Master is next to about 6 inches and the K-II has to be quite close.
Exhibit A http://yfrog.com/1acapt1007090955j
This waterfall spectrograph shows a plain flashlight spraying EMF (the horizontal lines) up to at least 24,000 Hertz at 6 inches. It goes further at closer proximity.
http://yfrog.com/edcapt1007090959j
Shows a closer look to 1000 Hertz with the tailcap switch being gently twisted on/off at about 6 – 8 inches away.
http://yfrog.com/0dcapt1007090958j
At closer proximity now, just a couple of inches away.
A youtube video I made showing the effects of a flashlight on the Gauss Master and K-II.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjQX7qzpUuo
As I have always said, and here's my soapbox, it is VERY BAD PRACTISE, while hunting EMF anomalies, to put an EMF detector ANYWHERE NEAR ANY ELECTRONICS! Like this!
http://yfrog.com/12emftorchj
I'm sorry, but the students get a big F for fail from me and a bigger F go to the "teachers" that teach the students Jack squat in this fake academy.
|
|
|
|
|
7:34 am July 9, 2010
| Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2956 |
|
|
Thanks Learjet, very in-depth answer!
In this particular case they are using the Lutron (I believe this was their detector of choice early on) and the light is indeed a mini-mag. I can't quite tell from the footage but it appears to be in Gauss mode (vs Tesla) and in the shot where we can see the readout, it is probably 2-3 inches from the flashlight.
The flashlight IS parallel to the meter so perpendicular to the sensor with the sensor intersecting the flashlight (at least they got that right if they want to measure the ghost grabbing the flashlight) In the window shot (the one I mention above where there is bad editing) the sensor portion of the meter is well away from the flashlight…the EMF sensor of the detector is perpendicular to the barrel, but the sensor itself does not intersect the flashlight.
I cannot see the far right digit of the meter, but there is a gap between the middle figure and the edge and I see no digits forming in that gap when the light goes on.
You said the K2 added RF. Would the Lutron be of use in detecting an RF signal being sent to the flashlight? ie remote control?
We've seen during their Q&A with the K2 that the ghost can easily spike the lights so 20+ milligauss. The lighting of the flashlight did not change the "ones" digit on the Lutron. I can't be certain about the digit right of the decimal, though, although I don't see any change in the display to indicate a number forming. The cadets do NOT mention any EMF activity so we have a discrepancy in what they show a ghost to be able to do (if the SFT is real, and if the K2 Q&A are real for that matter, too)
One thing I should point out is that in the bedscene with the Lutron and the MiniMag, the HEAD of the flashlight (where the bulb-battery contact would be) is left and below the sensor axis of the meter.
I'm going to have to pick up a meter or two just to play around with I think! lol
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
8:59 am July 9, 2010
| Learjet
| | Australia | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1122 |
|
|
Nosfer said:
You said the K2 added RF. Would the Lutron be of use in detecting an RF signal being sent to the flashlight? ie remote control?
Can't be 100% sure since I don't have a Lutron meter but I don't believe it would detect R/C.
|
|
|
|