It would seem some topics might be better for consideration than others.
EVPs are problematic, not only because we don't have the full context, but because it is difficult to know if they are even technically EVPs or just anomalous sounds that weren't noticed, or were intentially generated, at the time of the recording.
On the other hand, in a video, one might be able to discern the actual mechanism of fraud.
Plus EVP has become a catchall word/acronym for any sound. GH has referred to some things as EVPs that were heard during the investigation itself by the investigators at the time. That does not fit the definition of an EVP which, in part, is a sound not heard at the time and only captured on a recording device by some as-yet unsatisfactorily explained process.
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
I've been thinking about this (non) EVP and Stephen's post. I made the mistake of listening so intently for the whisper that I mentally blocked out the investigators speech so I never connected the "they don't care" whisper to the rest of the ongoing conversation. I still don't know how I got "thank you" from it either. It's actually quite fascinating. I reckon it would make a good case study for how some EVP's materialize.
Anyone tried to point this out to them? I wonder what their reaction would be? Acceptance or denial?
Login 
Register 
The Forum [is where Ancient Roman skeptics hang out.]
Reply to Post
Quote and Reply 
Print this Post 
Topic RSS 
