Actually there may be a surprise addition to the story later this year….I will keep you all informed.

It is all EMF, meaning an electromagnetic field. The EMF is a very broad spectrum, from .1 Hertz to cosmic and X-Rays, and light in between. The differenc eis paranormal classified events tend to have activity in the very low frequency range, from below the Schuman resonance through the audio spectrum (hence EVP) and into the Brainwave spectrum on its way. Very little is found above 20,000 Hz, and in fact, I have found nothing above about 15KHZ.

For years when you went to school, the clocks were all synced up by broadcasting a signal directly across the power lines to set the clocks. the only issue is the transmission is localized. transformers tend to block it out or further distorrt the signal, but it works very much like a distrubuted audio system using 70.7 volts. Same kind of principle. And as such, the signal trace is a horrid method of looking for voices, as its frequency response is designed to specifically play the signal from a "beeper" signal generator, which is very narrow banded in its scope. It does work well to locate noisy 60Hz sources quickly, and in the ten years I have been using them I have never picked up a voice, and I use them at work, as well as in the research of the paranormal. This is precisesly why the claim is so ridiculous, just as the claims concerning Frank's Box and Shack hacks are ridiculous. Let's just say that when we die we do miraculously sprout an AM transmitter, and the ability to both modulate our EMF on the carrier wave, as well as selectively broadcast it at the same randome rate as the auto-tuning function does in these gadgets. If this is so, then everyone that listens to AM radio should also from time to time get a random out of place word in a strange voice coming through their receiver. So far I have not heard of this happeneing. And if it did, you would have to rule out external RF interference using an RF spectrum analyzer, which NONE of these characters are doing, nor will they agree to do. That also speaks volumes. We tested both of these devices in the lab, and were able to locate the source station for every word the boxes reproduced, and all of them originated at a commercial broadcast station. The random assembly of words can be compelling, but it is in the end, a random asseblage of words or phonetics, depending on the scan rate the operator dials in. Easily debunked, as you would well know as a radio person. So it is hard for me to take anyone who uses these methods with a grain of salt. And to claim one is educated in Quantum mechanics while doing it is ludicrous. Particularly when the area of study claimed isn't even a program at the college, and is a small online course offered to the general public for free.

Question everything. Don't take my word for it, do your own research. All I can say is I have consistently spoken my mind based on my knowledge base and research, and have openly asked others to verify my own work to validate it. Anyone who doesn't do that has something to hide, IMHO.

The funny thing is their "theories" do not even qualify as theories. More like Hypothesis at the best, fanciful opinions based on Folklore at the least. But I humbly agree with you. The scientific method is designed to be applied to all research, and should be. Objective evaluation of data and evidence is the methodology for driving conclusions, not jumping off a proverbial popular cliff.

They reveal plenty of clues to their cluelessness in any of his talks…..just google him sometime and listen…we selected excerpts from over 15 different shows he did over several years to get an accurate assessment. Some of the things he says are certainly revealing of his basic scientific understanding of things. A Quantum Physicist he ain't……