| User | Post |
|
3:18 pm
February 19, 2012
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2954 |
|
|
In this eagerly anticipated sequel to "Beer and Bigfoot", the team heads to Kentucky to investigate footage that purportedly shows a bright pair of eyes. I wonder if they are bloodshot? Matt and company also try a new search technique which probably entails taking out an ad in the wanted section of the local newspaper or possibly setting out a whiskey trap in hopes of enticing an already intoxicated squatch.
Meanwhile, Matt tries to convince us a certain piece of sidewalk has a bigfoot track on it and berates Ranae when she tries to tell him its a leaf.
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
7:57 pm
February 19, 2012
|
blinddog
| | Special Agent Zombie Elimination Agency | |
| Moderator
| posts 857 |
|
|
Post edited 8:31 pm – February 19, 2012 by blinddog
There is a theory, that every early hominid species had a Matt Moneymaker in their tribe.
As hunters and gathers they did not succeed because of total failure in the hunting arena.
25 years and no Squatch yet. Matt your skills are lacking. Just nuts and berries do not a sucessful species make.
Thankfully the species that became modern man had a couple of Jasons' in it. He always finds something.
Grants' hominid species became famous as the missing link. Always faking evolutionary steps.
|
Double tap to the head. Don't become Undead.
|
|
|
8:52 am
February 20, 2012
|
Learjet
| | Australia | |
| Lead Investigator | posts 1119 |
|
|
If I had the original uncompressed video, and it went for longer than 4 seconds, I could get an image out of that eye video and show the owl. Unfortunately I can't do it with 4 seconds of low quality compressed internet video.
Astronomers use frame stacking software to get the equivalent of a time exposure from video. To get a deep image from that you would need 20 seconds to a minute+ of video. Camera shake doesn't matter, it can be compensated by reference point tracking, in this case the owl's eyes.
Yeah I know, too complicated for these morons.
|
|
|
|
|
3:47 pm
February 21, 2012
|
Lindy
| | |
| Investigator in Training | posts 24 |
|
|
Donuts?…………come on!
Now I've seen everything.
What are they trying to catch……….a cop?
|
|
|
6:08 pm
February 21, 2012
|
Nosfer
| | Rotaredom | |
| Moderator
| posts 2954 |
|
|
Lindy said:
Now I've seen everything.
With this group? Not even close to everything!
|
Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.
|
|
|
2:30 pm
February 22, 2012
|
Lindy
| | |
| Investigator in Training | posts 24 |
|
|
Post edited 2:33 pm – February 22, 2012 by Lindy
I suppose that's true..I mean, they haven't broadcast Beethovens Symphony #7 Triple Concerto or had ping pong tournaments in the woods yet, cuz you know……Squatches love to play pong while listening to classical music.
Since the BFRO believes that there may be between 2,000 and 6,000 of these in existence, you would think that they would be well documented. I would be interested in the number of reported sightings by reputable people with a lot of real time and experience in the woods such as park rangers. To my knowledge, Dick Proenneke (Alone in the Wilderness) never reported seeing anything unusual or unexplainable.
|
|
Login 
Register 
The Forum [is where Ancient Roman skeptics hang out.]
Print this Post 
Topic RSS 
