The Forum [is where Ancient Roman skeptics hang out.]

Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering


Lost Your Password?

Destination Truth – Hoia Baciu Haunted Forest – Romania

Reply to Post
UserPost

11:38 am
September 11, 2009


Oubliette

Igloo in NJ

Lead Investigator

posts 574

Review coming soon!

If 50 million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing.
Anatole France

10:44 am
September 14, 2009


The Doctor

Lead Investigator

posts 488

They fly 10,000 miles from L.A. to Romaina, finally find the location in the middle of the night, then bail out the next day for home.   ?

… a quick visit to googleearth ( put in hoia baciu forrest ) would have given them the coordinates of their quest without having to muck around with the plane.  Playing around with the 3d view a bit gives a few possiblities for the lights they see – depending which way they were seeing them, it could very well be lights of vehicles on other hills, but they didn't seem to worry too much about what direction the lights were, or even think to take that into account.

The review with Grant and Jason was almost comical – Grant poo-poohs the EVPs since they did not have "control" of the area …?    Since EVP's are sounds that are NOT heard, are you admitting that there is a possiblity for ALL suspected evp's that the sound WAS really there and had a natural cause … you just missed hearing it so it never occured to try and debunk it ?

As far as the Evan event, Jason sums it up when he says " I have no idea" …. at that point Josh should have thanked him for his time and asked if they knew of someone who might actually have an idea of what happened, the twin deamonologists perhaps ?

J must have been fuming internally that Josh was able to come up with more entertaining evidence then GH has in five years of trying.

Can't wait to see what S&T do when Josh brings them evidence  next week …

10:49 am
September 14, 2009


Nosfer

Rotaredom

Moderator

posts 2954

Be funny if the evidence he brings S&T was a big *ss spider thought to have been extinct for millions of years!

Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.

12:24 pm
September 14, 2009


Bobarino

Valencia, CA

Investigator

posts 181

What ?!?!   Did yo say S&T are on DT this week? 

::heart sinking::

I've found that being AWESOME is a full time job…

12:28 pm
September 14, 2009


The Doctor

Lead Investigator

posts 488

Bobarino said:

What ?!?!   Did yo say S&T are on DT this week? 

::heart sinking::


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destination_Truth#Episode_format

11:42 am
September 16, 2009


Bruce

Guest

When is Taps going to Hoia Baciu Haunted Forest ?

11:50 am
September 16, 2009


Revenant

Hopelessly Locked In A "Fear Cage"

Lead Investigator

posts 1393

Bruce said:

When is Taps going to Hoia Baciu Haunted Forest ?


TAPS is already there, no need to worry.  Jason and Grant will be opening a second Inn there.  You'll be able to visit, spend the night, and go on tours with them too.  It will be Hawsome!

"Skepticism is not a position, it's a process." -Dr Michael Shermer

1:33 pm
September 16, 2009


Nosfer

Rotaredom

Moderator

posts 2954

Bruce said:

When is Taps going to Hoia Baciu Haunted Forest ?


Course, it would probably be GHI doing it instead of TAPS/GH :)

Legal: The content of this post is copyrighted and is intended exclusively for use on skepticalviewer.com It may not be copied, distributed, or redisplayed on any other site without the express written consent of the author.

2:10 pm
September 16, 2009


alicat

Lead Investigator

posts 1215

Bruce said:

When is Taps going to Hoia Baciu Haunted Forest ?


And it will only cost you 586.284 in Romanian New Lei for the boot camp and 586.284 Romanian New Lei a night for the room.  That strictly includes only your room and swell muffins/danish and coffee in the a.m. which you can either sitting in the lobby balancing your plate or on the road while finding amenities elsewhere.  No travel costs to/from are included.  In US currency, that's about $199 for the boot camp and $199 a night for the room, not including tax.  Enjoy!

P.S.  I hear a medic got sick over there so don't drink the water.  Plus, you may not want the coffee either.

8:04 pm
March 28, 2010


JM

Guest

Posting verbatim/cut'n'paste from my comment on Oubliette's review for the episode….apologies for being a prima donna like that, but I'm just so happy to have finally debunked this one–it's been bothering me for months:

I have the culprit behind Evan's attack, I'm very sure…

This one bothered me for months; it's been one a small handful of paranormal show cases I could not debunk. Until today!

Let's start with the fact that Evan was _not_ flung.  If you watch the footage frame by frame, he is clearly blindsided, and jumps up and back in an effort to fend off _something_, staggers back in a fit of pure, terrified panic, and falls on his ass.   There's nothing to suggest his feet ever leave the ground.

With this in mind, and noting the claw marks left by the attack, I immediately assumed a large animal of some kind, and looked up what kind of big, terrestrial predators they have in Romania:

The Carpathian Brown Bear.  The Grey Wolf. And the Lynx.

The lynx is unlikely because of its small size and lack of territoriality with humans, Wolves don't leave "claw marks", even on the rare occasions when they attack people, and a bear would have messed him up a LOT more.

And so I was stuck.  Until I realized my mistake.  _Terrestrial_ predators.

Meet the Eurasian Eagle Owl:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasian_Eagle-owl

Three feet in standing height,  a near seven foot wingspan, and the largest owl on Earth.  Territorial, and relatively unafraid of humans.  And, like all owls,completely silent in flight.  Seriously, look up videos of owl flight, they float like ghosts in the air.  Completely capable of knocking a grown man flat on his ass, as well as taking foxes and lambs as prey items.

Evan describes his assailant thus: "Like a wind just blew at me. It came down from the sky and just shot at me."   Matches owl.   As do the claw mark patterns.

Furthermore, this might explain the lights they were chasing earlier in the episode.  As we all know, the eyes of nocturnal animals, even when small, are exceptional light reflectors…and you don't get a nocturnal animal eye much bigger than the world's largest owl.  Note that all of those lights "flew" and were all observed to be at treeline level or so.

Finally, the second of the two sounds they got…the one that sounds like demonic female laughter? 
Here's a pissed off female Eagle Owl:

http://www.owlpages.com/sounds/Bubo-bubo-3.mp3

The only aspect I can't yet explain is the first, more moany sound they got, but I think it's enough to put this one to bed.  : )

12:07 am
March 31, 2010


Revenant

Hopelessly Locked In A "Fear Cage"

Lead Investigator

posts 1393

To JM – I greatly appreciate the effort and time it took to formulate your theory.  I thank you for posting it.  However, I am going to respectfully disagree with the theory.  Hear me out..

I always enjoyed DT.  Fun to watch and fun to discuss afterwards…usually because they came up with very little evidence.  After all, things such as the Mongolian Death Worm is quite elusive.  But this particular episode was troublesome.  Like yourself…it never sat well with me.  And it still doesn't, but for very different reasons.

The entire episode was riddled with weirdness.  Much of it detailed in Oubliette's article and the accompanying thread so I won't go over all of it.  Although…my favorite one was the "not so deathly Circle of Death (the clearing had no trees or shrubs, but wild grasses were definitely growing)." 

JM said: "Let's start with the fact that Evan was _not_ flung.  If you watch the footage frame by frame, he is clearly blindsided, and jumps up and back in an effort to fend off _something_, staggers back in a fit of pure, terrified panic, and falls on his ass.   There's nothing to suggest his feet ever leave the ground."

This paragraph is incorrect.  Evan is not "clearly blindsided."  Why?  Because we do not see anything in the video blindsiding him.  Because of this…he is not clearly blindsided.  His "effort to fend off something" is an assumption.  Whether he "staggers back in a fit of pure, terrified panic" is a personal interpretation of what you saw.  And actually, the video does not show him as he "falls on his ass"…also an assumption.

The video, frame by frame or really, just looking at it simply shows a man in a seated position, rise up quickly, move his hand upwards and disappear out of the camera shot due to the delay in the video feed.

From this, you or I cannot determine his state of mind (pure, terrified panic) or his intentions (fending something off).  The poor quality of the video and the length of it simply does not allow for it.

JM said: "With this in mind, and noting the claw marks left by the attack, I immediately assumed a large animal of some kind, and looked up what kind of big, terrestrial predators they have in Romania."

My problem with this is the assumption that the claw marks were "real" and not self-imposed.  This is the case for almost all the "a ghost scratched my back" or "a demon scratched my leg" type of claims.  It is an extraordinary claim…which, of course, needs extraordinary evidence.  Do we have it in this case?  Like in every other case, no, we do not.  We simply have Evan's word that he did not scratch his arm in the brush or worse, simply scratched the marks into his arm himself.  There is absolutely no video evidence to prove that his arm was scratched by "unworldly" means. 

Now…let's get back to what we have…the video.  In the video, we do not see anything other than Evan.  No birds.  No owls.  No wings.  No tails.  No claws.  No Charm's Blow-Pop's.  Nothing.  There is no physical evidence to support the claim of an owl or any other worldly creature.  And…they made no claim of an animal or bird attack.  Even if they did…the video does not support this.

JM also said: "Furthermore, this might explain the lights they were chasing earlier in the episode.  As we all know, the eyes of nocturnal animals, even when small, are exceptional light reflectors…and you don't get a nocturnal animal eye much bigger than the world's largest owl.  Note that all of those lights "flew" and were all observed to be at treeline level or so."

True…but two problems.  The lights were singular, not in pairs.  Well, one could say the reflection of the two eyes just kind of blurred into one big blur of reflected light.  Well…kind of weak…but even if I let you have that, it doesn't matter.  They debunked this themselves.  Keep in mind, they used the FLIR several times to view the treeline and Josh states that nothing was being picked up.  If the owls were close enough to cause a substantial reflected light from their eyes…their heat signature would have been picked up. 

To anyone still reading this….my beef is certainly not with JM.  My problem is with the show.  I do not believe that anything supernatural happened that night.  I also do not believe that there is any rational explanation (as in owls, other birds, animals, wind, etc) that could account for what we saw.  The rather poor evidence issued keeps pointing in one direction…Evan faked it, with or without Josh Gate's knowledge.  My money is on him knowing.  Can I prove it?  Not in the least…as such is the beauty of the paranormal shows.  So close…but never a cigar…(not even GH's Collargate was a 100% slam-dunk, only in the 98% range…). 

I can go on and on and on…which I'm already doing.  Again, many of the points for this conclusion are in the article thread.  Perhaps when I have more time, I'll go into personal "interpretations" of what happened beyond what just the evidence shows.  But to sum things up for now…no, I do not believe that it was an owl attack.  Nothing…has been put to bed on this particular episode.

"Skepticism is not a position, it's a process." -Dr Michael Shermer

1:23 pm
March 31, 2010


Bobarino

Valencia, CA

Investigator

posts 181

Thank JM for your Analysis.   I am glad to see there are still some critical thinkers out there.   You took a lot of time and effort to get to your conclusion.

I too though have to agree with Rev that I am not sure you are correct.  While I admit it is Possible, the evidence doesn't seem to go with your suggestion 100% as well.    But there are parts that could be correct that is for sure.

I like DT, and to be honest it is the LAST show I watch on this subject.   I got burned out by all the BS.  At least DT is entertaining and I get a chuckle here and there.  But this last season they have gotten into the habbit of taking their evidnce to GH for review.  I cringe every tiem they do that, and with the increased crossover appearances, makes me lean toward thinking they are faking evindence, or at least not seriously looking at evidnce, as well. 

It is too bad, but perhaps in the media-corporate atmosphere he (Josh) is doing it to keep his show on the air.   Can't blame him for that…I guess.    But it does hurt the field of study in genereal though as less people will take it seriously.

I too could go on and on but I will end it here :-D

I've found that being AWESOME is a full time job…

11:46 pm
March 31, 2010


JM

Guest

Attempting to respond to both complaints….may or may not be able to do this without editing later….but I'll address the primary objections to the my theory:

First of all:  Well, of course it all could have been staged.  I'm positing this theory based on the assumption that what we've been given is more or less genuine and that no real attempt has been made to purposefully or maliciously decieve the audience.  Which may be a big assumption to make, I admit.  If it were Paranormal State we were talking about, I wouldn't bother with researching wiildlife at all, and probably wouldn't bother with it in the first place.  This also includes the scratches not being self-inflicted, etc.

I mean, if the whole thing was staged….I'd kinda hope they would have done a better job in doing so, honestly.

The floating lights being singular….well, you're only going to see _one_ eye unless the owl is flying directly toward the camera, which is the most unlikely of angles.  And the brightness of the lights on the night vision cams matches quite well the light reflection they regularly get from the eyes of the human hosts, if you watch. 

As for the Owl(s) not showing up on FLIR….  I'm reminded of a particular 9/11 Truther Movement retard's attempt to use FLIR footage of the burning WTC towers to "prove" that the fires weren't burning hot enough to melt(or even significantly weaken) steel.   *

FLIR only shows the _surface_ temperature of _solid_ objects.   Humans show up white hot on these things, as do most mammals.  Owls, however, are birds, which while also "warm blooded", aren't going to show up as well as you'd think:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-512436/Thermal-imaging-zoo-pictures-reveal-animals-hot-cold-secrets.html

(apologies for using dailyfail as evidence, but the animals in question had no poliitical affiliations at the time the photos were taken, so its safe to assume no bias, I think)

Note the stark difference between the deer (or is it a moose…I'm too lazy to double check) and the pelican.  And both photos are at considerable proximity to the animal.  An owl not showing up on the FLIR in any discernible fashion is honestly something I'd expect.  Also remember that fog/mist/aerosol spray routinely blinds FLIR–and honestly, FLIR is so completely Flaw-ridden, imperfect, and unreliable for this sort of thing that I really don't pay it much mind at all anymore.

As far as my assumption that he wasn't flung…I admit I may have been overstepping my assumptive bounds here, but one must admit that there really isn't anything to suggest he _was_ flung like a rag doll, either.  Watching it again…I do see an outline of his figure…or what I think looks like Evan's figure, fade out into the background directly after the "sitting" and "OH NOES OMFG SATAN'S AFTER MAH SOUL!" frames, growing fainter and smaller, the last one _looking a collapsed human on his back.  My interpretation of that lattermost frame, I'll concede as conjecture more or less no better than the assumption that Great Cthulhu tried to mindsuck him….but him backing up in panicked response to being suddenly attacked by an animal makes a bit more sense in terms of Occam's Razor, wouldn't you agree?  And that's what I meant by "blindsided", honestly–apologies if that language was misleading.   All I meant was that something surprised him, and surprised him _a lot_, which I don't think you can argue agaiinst.

In closing…my thought process here was thus:

I gave DT the benefit of the doubt in assuming that it wasn't staged, and that Evan didn't claw himself up for the benefit of the show.

Going on this, and my firm belief that ghosts/demons/unicorns/God all aren't real, I had to come to the conclusion of an animal assailant.

None of the area's terrestrial predators made any sense.  Thus, I found a more or less perfect aerial one.

And, don't get me wrong: I love Destination Truth; Other than Paranatural/American Paranormal on NatGeo, it's by far my favorite of the Paranormal Show horde, mostly due to Josh Gates…the show isn't about finding the Werewolf Dino Mutant of Southern Bumf*ck, Timbuktu…it's about a sarcastic, nerdy smartass travelling to oddball places and knowing he isn't going to find said Dino Mutant Devil Ghost Monster.  It's the only one of the horde that is actually self-aware and self-effacing, and I love that.    He gets taken in (or is forced to by his producers) every once in a while, but it's worth putting up with.

It could all be scripted…but there's no smoking gun evidence to indicate that (yet). Unlike Paranormal State, whose "scripted" evidence is an ever growing mountain of inconsistiencies and fabrications, and Ghost Hunters, which has shot itself in the foot so many times I've lost count.

Large owls are the cause of, I'm fairly sure, the _bulk_ of woodland "paranormal" experiences…I mean look at the Jersey Devil.  Tell me that doesn't scream Great Horned Owl.  And remember that owl eyes will appear to glow red, etc.   If I was attacked by one in the middle of the woods, at night….I'd probably piss my pants and think a hellbeast was after me too.

* Tossing this footnote in to safeguard against nutjobs, please ignore if you're not a nutjob:  Yes, the fires _didn't_ burn hot enough to melt steel, but they did burn hot enough to cause steel to lose half its structural strength.  Said temperature is actually significantly lower than the melting point for steel.  Apologies, but one has to do these things.

12:16 pm
April 16, 2010


SSCD90

Guest

It would be better if everyone could conduct their own experiments on the forest, wouldn't it? They could either validate or disprove DT's evidence. There is a chance that they're faking everything to get ratings. However, there are things out there that people cannot explain or fathom. That's what makes GH and DT so attractive to people. They either really want to believe that there are paranormal things out there or they already do due to personal experiences. Don't you think? Now, I am neither validating GH and DT nor am I disproving them and their research. I'm just saying that there is an attraction for believers and those who want to believe.

12:53 pm
April 16, 2010


Bobarino

Valencia, CA

Investigator

posts 181

SSCD,

You are right, but just remember you on a site for Skeptics.  

I too want to beleive, but I subscribe to the scientific method.  I had a personal experince.  Yet, I still have no proof and as such do not believe I expereinced what I think I experienced.  To this day I look for proof/disproof of what happened.  Until then it is just a wierd event that could maybe be explained.

That is the essence.  Everyone can "want to beleive".   I am in no way trying to tell people what to think, nor is anyone here.  But when it comes time to leave entertainment and enter science, we have to be more grounded when coming up with a decision, all desires aside.

I've found that being AWESOME is a full time job…

1:59 pm
April 16, 2010


Common Raven

Guest

JM,

Thank you for your very well though-out and researched post. Like many of you on this thread, I find this episode particularly troubling. In part it's because I still want to believe….that Destination Truth has an element of authenticity that Ghost Hunters, Ghost Lab,  Ghost Adventures, etc. do not. I enjoy that 95 percent of the time they find nothing, and that the other 4 percent of the time, they find things like noises, etc. that I would expect anyone running around in unfamiliar woods and graveyards at night might find perplexing.

The Haunted Forest episode, however, is a different category, I think. This isn't the usual faked footprint they photograph, the underwater eel they can't recognize from above water, or coyote that is unfamiliar sounding to them. Collectively, the remarkable (if not entirely clear) footage, the investigator's personal account, and the physical evidence of the event remind me of Grant's collar in Ghost Hunters — evidence so extra-ordinary so as to force the skeptical viewer to review it with a find toothed comb. Indeed, when Josh Gates asked to have questions sent to him via Twitter a few months ago, the one question I asked was "What do YOU really think happened at Baciu Haunted Forest?" Of course, he didn't respond to my question, but he did take the time to explain that he prefers brunettes rather than blondes.

As you said, you begin your anaylysis with some assumption of the sincerity-of-the-event on their part; if we don't, then "all bets are off," so to speak. The Eurasian Eagle Owl is, I think, a very plausible explanation. Although I am unfamiliar with this bird, it is known to attack humans in the same way as shown on the footage. It is also consistent with the physical evidence, and with the personal account given by the investigator. I am an avid bird watcher, and can tell you that I would not be surprised at all to have a bird misidentified (or better, non-identified) by an impressionable amateur "investigator" who is sitting in the darkness in the middle of an unfamiliar place that goes by the name "haunted forest."

What bothers me in part is this: Presumably, if paranormal this is is remarkable evidence to me; you could easily do an entire 1/2 hour of analysis, discussion, show any competing camera angles, etc. Even Ghost Hunters knows to stretch the segment into an entire hour if they have something interesting. Instead, they treat it as they do all other evidence, like the faked footprints, etc. One quick segment, and on to the end of the show. I've already begun to question DT's sincerity. In particular I find it hard to believe that they'll fly to Egypt, find nothing, then go back to L.A., only to go back to some nearby place again the next episode, and repeat. At best this is poor editing; at worst, it's misleading and deceptive. This leads me to believe that there is probably a more "owly" explanation for what happened that night. Occam should be proud, I think you've added another blade to his Razor on this one. (The first being they could've faked the whole thing.)

Elias

5:03 pm
April 16, 2010


SSCD90

Guest

Bobarino,

Yes, I know I'm on a site for skeptics. That's why I was saying people want to believe. And, I also mentioned conducting experiments in the forest. I do prefer scientific methods, that's why I would prefer to do it myself with people who are skeptical and want to look at every point of view.

9:25 pm
April 16, 2010


Stealth

Guest

For JM,

To say science needs your mind would be an understatement. What do you do for a living? Keep posting your answers to these forums, it keeps the fantasy-prone (like myself, I admit) grounded to reality.

10:51 pm
April 17, 2010


JM

Guest

Stealth said:

For JM,

To say science needs your mind would be an understatement. What do you do for a living? Keep posting your answers to these forums, it keeps the fantasy-prone (like myself, I admit) grounded to reality.


I'm an unemployed technical writer with far too much time on his hands, sadly. I have some educational background in psychology and biology, but that's the extent of it.

If anything, I'd like my apparent success here to be evidence that anyone can  do this, with a little skepticism and a little OCD.  : )

Reply to Post


Reply to Topic:
Destination Truth – Hoia Baciu Haunted Forest – Romania

Guest Name (Required):

Guest Email (Required):

Smileys
Confused Cool Cry Embarassed Frown Kiss Laugh Smile Surprised Wink Yell
Post New Reply

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of:
10 + 4
   



Permalink Print
Copyright 2010 SkepticalViewer.com - The Ghost Hunters Fansite for Skeptics